Table 1 — Input Token Pricing (per 1M tokens, USD)
Provider
Model
Input Price
OpenAI
GPT-4o
$2.50
OpenAI
GPT-4o-mini
$0.15
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4
$3.00
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 3.5
$0.80
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$1.25
Gemini 2.5 Flash
$0.15
Token Landing
Hybrid (blended)
~$0.80–1.50
Table 2 — Output Token Pricing (per 1M tokens, USD)
Provider
Model
Output Price
OpenAI
GPT-4o
$10.00
OpenAI
GPT-4o-mini
$0.60
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4
$15.00
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 3.5
$4.00
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$10.00
Gemini 2.5 Flash
$0.60
Token Landing
Hybrid (blended)
~$3.00–6.00
Table 3 — Monthly Cost Estimate (1M requests/month)
Assumes an average of 500 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens per request.
Approach
Monthly Cost
Quality
All GPT-4o
~$16,250
Highest
All GPT-4o-mini
~$975
Good
All Claude Sonnet
~$24,000
Highest
Helix Hybrid
~$5,000–9,500
High (A-tier on critical paths)
Prices are approximate as of early 2026 and may change without notice. Always verify with each provider's official pricing page before committing to a budget.
Why output tokens dominate your bill
Look at the tables above: output tokens cost 3–5x more than input tokens across every provider. The reason is
computational. Input tokens are processed in parallel during a single forward pass, while output tokens require
autoregressive generation — the model produces one token at a time, maintaining full attention state at each step.
For most conversational or agentic workloads, output tokens outnumber input tokens 2:1 to 4:1. That means
**output pricing is responsible for 75–90% of your total API spend**. If you want to cut costs,
start by reducing output token volume — shorter system prompts that guide concise replies, structured output
formats, and [caching strategies](reduce-llm-api-costs) all help. See
[input vs output tokens](input-vs-output-tokens) for a deep dive.
The case for hybrid routing
Running every request through a frontier model like Claude Sonnet 4 or GPT-4o delivers top quality — but the
monthly bill adds up fast, as Table 3 shows. Conversely, using only a mini/flash model saves money but sacrifices
quality on the requests that matter most (first user-facing replies, tool calls, error recoveries).
[Hybrid routing](hybrid-ai-tokens) splits the difference. A policy layer classifies each
request and routes it to the appropriate tier: A-tier models for high-stakes turns, value-tier models for
bulk and repetition-safe work. The result is 40–70% lower spend compared to an all-premium stack, with
near-identical perceived quality. For architecture details, see
[hybrid AI tokens](hybrid-ai-tokens) and
[OpenAI-compatible API](openai-compatible-api).
How to estimate your spend
Use this formula:
**Monthly cost = requests/month x [(avg input tokens x input price) + (avg output tokens x output price)]**
For example, 1M requests at 500 input + 1,500 output tokens on GPT-4o:
1,000,000 x [(500 x $2.50 / 1,000,000) + (1,500 x $10.00 / 1,000,000)] = 1,000,000 x [$0.00125 + $0.015] = **$16,250/month**
Swap in the hybrid blended rates from the tables above and the same workload drops to $5,000–9,500/month. For a
step-by-step walkthrough, see the [AI token pricing guide](ai-token-pricing-guide).
Disclaimer: Pricing data is gathered from public provider documentation and may not reflect
negotiated enterprise rates, volume discounts, or regional variations. Token Landing hybrid pricing depends on
your specific tier mix and routing configuration. This page is for informational purposes and does not constitute
a contractual price guarantee.
Originally published on Token Landing
Top comments (0)