DEV Community

Abdul Shamim
Abdul Shamim

Posted on

Building Feasibility.pro: Lessons from Engineering Real-Estate Feasibility Software

When we started working on Feasibility.pro, the goal was simple on paper — make real-estate feasibility modeling faster, more transparent, and less spreadsheet-dependent.
In reality, it meant solving problems that most people outside this niche rarely think about.

Here are a few things we had to fix along the way 👇

1. Dynamic Cash-Flow Modeling

Real-estate projects are never linear — phasing, funding, and sales overlap.
We had to build a calculation engine that handles non-sequential timelines, changing interest cycles, and variable payment schedules — without breaking the model every time an assumption changes.

2. Scenario Simulation at Scale

Excel can do sensitivity checks, but not at the scale investors need.
We built a backend service that runs multiple what-if scenarios in parallel, caching outputs so users can compare profitability, IRR, and risk metrics instantly.

3. Collaboration Without Chaos

Traditional feasibility models live in email threads.
We moved collaboration inside the platform — role-based access, live audit trails, and version control for assumptions so teams can debate inputs instead of chasing file versions.

4. Data Integrity and Transparency

Executives and analysts interpret numbers differently.
We focused on traceability — every number in Feasibility.pro can be drilled down to its source assumption. It builds trust between finance, engineering, and project teams.

What We Learned

  • Real-estate feasibility is as much about clarity as it is about calculation.
  • Replacing Excel isn’t about prettier dashboards — it’s about structuring financial logic for teams to actually trust.
  • The right abstraction layer can make developers, analysts, and decision-makers speak the same “modeling” language.

We’re still refining parts of Feasibility.pro — especially around API-driven reporting and integration with project-management tools — but this journey has shown how deep the problem of “feasibility” really goes.

Would love to hear how others have approached similar modeling or simulation challenges — especially in finance, construction, or infra tech.

Top comments (0)