Hey everyone,
I've been building small web tools and decided to tackle something
I personally found frustrating — most resume builders either have
a confusing UI or lock the PDF behind a paywall.
So I built two different approaches and I want to know which one
people actually prefer.
Version 1 — Edit directly on the resume
The resume is already there — you just click any text and edit it
directly. Name, job titles, bullet points, everything. Hit print
and you get a clean PDF. No forms, no steps, just edit and print.
Note: print formatting works best in Firefox right now. Chrome
support is being fixed.
Version 2 — Fill a form, generate resume
More traditional approach. Fill in your details — name, experience,
education, even paste a photo. Click Generate and your resume
appears below ready to print.
What's missing (honestly)
- Only one template design each
- Can't add extra work experience or education entries yet in resume-builder
- Chrome print formatting needs work
- No dark mode
What I want to add next
- More templates
- Better cross-browser print support
- More clues to what to write for freshers.
Both are completely free. No signup, no watermark, no paywall.
I'd love to know:
- Which version do you prefer and why?
- What's the one thing that would make you actually use this over Canva or Resume.io?
- Any features you wish existed?
Honest feedback welcome — including if it's terrible.
Top comments (0)