👀 Do You Really Need a Refactor?
Sometimes we're tempted to refactor just because the code "looks ugly", but that's not always a good enough reason.
A solid refactor starts with a real, measurable need.
Here are signs that a refactor is truly worth the effort:
- ⚠️ One change breaks unrelated parts — butterfly effect everywhere
- 🔁 Duplicate logic all over the place
- 🧩 Code is hard to understand, even for the original author
- 🐌 Poor performance without obvious cause
- ❌ Low or no test coverage, making changes risky
- 🧱 Tightly coupled modules that prevent new features from being added
- 🤯 Huge functions doing 10 things at once
👉 When your codebase starts slowing you down, it's a clear sign that technical debt is taking its toll.
🎯 Define a Clear Goal
Refactoring is not a goal in itself. Ask yourself:
- Are we doing this to improve performance?
- Or to enable new features?
- Reduce bugs?
- Make code more testable?
🔍 Pick one or two primary objectives.
A refactor without a clear goal is just impulsive rewriting.
📊 Take a “Before” Snapshot
Before touching anything, capture some baseline metrics. You'll need these to prove the refactor was actually worth it. Examples:
- Execution time or load time
- Test coverage percentage
- Number of reported bugs
- Average dev time per feature
- Class/service coupling indicators
💡 Even a simple comparison table can be powerful to demonstrate improvement post-refactor.
🤝 Talk to the Business
Technically, the code might scream "Refactor me!", but if business stakeholders don't see value, you'll face resistance or pressure to skip it.
Tips for making the case:
- Translate it into risk: "this might fail in production if..."
- Show future impact: "every new feature here takes 30% longer"
- Sell it as an investment: "this will take 1 week and save 3 each month"
🚨 If you can't align with business goals, it might be better to postpone.
🧨 Evaluate the Risks!!!
Not all code is safe to touch. Some modules handle payments, email dispatch, automation, etc. Run a small internal risk audit:
- Are there tests that cover this code?
- How often is it used?
- What happens if it fails?
✍️ Document the risks and decide if you need a rollback plan (feature flags, toggles, manual fallback, etc.).
🔒 Not Everything Needs Refactoring
Sometimes it's better to leave ugly but stable code alone than to risk breaking something that works fine.
✅ TL;DR — Your Refactor Pre-Flight Checklist
Before touching any code:
- [ ] Know why you're refactoring
- [ ] Define clear, measurable goals
- [ ] Capture before-metrics
- [ ] Talk to stakeholders
- [ ] Understand the risks
- [ ] Be ready with a fallback plan
Cover image credit: Mohammad Rahmani, via Unsplash
Top comments (0)