AK DevCraft

Posted on Jul 5

When Should You Use Server-Side Rendering (SSR)?

#ssr #tutorial #frontend #javascript

Introduction

Modern frontend tooling gives us so many options: SSR, CSR, SSG, ISR, edge functions, etc., and it’s easy to get caught up in what’s trending. I’ve seen teams jump onto SSR just because it sounds “enterprise” or go full SPA without thinking through the SEO or performance impact.

The truth is: every rendering strategy is a trade-off. In fact, that's the First law of Software Architecture, "Everything is a trade-off".
SSR isn’t inherently better or worse; what matters is where and why you're using it.

SSR can solve specific problems really well, especially around SEO, performance, security, and network optimization. But, it also comes with operational overhead (think server cold starts, caching strategies, latency tuning, etc.). So, before you adopt it, understand what you're solving.

In this post, I’ll walk through the use cases where SSR helps and where CSR would either fall short or complicate things unnecessarily.

Use Cases

1. SEO Indexing & Web Crawling

If your app or site needs to be discoverable by search engines (like blog posts, product pages, and landing pages), SSR is the way to go. Google has improved in rendering JavaScript, sure, but relying on that is risky. With SSR, search engines get fully-formed HTML immediately—no extra work needed.

Think of it like handing Google a clean, ready-made plate instead of giving it ingredients and asking it to cook.

2. Keeping Secret Tokens, Well, Secret

Sometimes, you need to use secret keys (API tokens, DB credentials, etc.) to fetch data. You don’t want those secrets leaking into client-side bundles.
SSR runs on the server, which means it can safely access these secrets without exposing them to the browser.

This is especially handy when integrating with private APIs or server-to-server communication.

3. Fewer Network Calls for the User

Another big win: when you can do the heavy lifting on the server.
Let’s say you need to make multiple API calls or combine results; doing that on the server reduces the network and compute burden on the client.

The user gets a ready-to-render page with fewer round-trips, faster TTFP, and better performance on slow devices or networks.

4. Personalization Without Client Round-Trips

If you need to personalize content based on user data (like location, auth session, device type), SSR allows you to inject this directly into the HTML on the first load. No flashing empty states, no waiting for client-side JavaScript to fetch user info and re-render the DOM.

Think geo-based offers, locale-specific pricing, or user dashboard previews—all rendered right from the server with context-aware HTML.

This avoids layout shifts, reduces perceived load time, and ensures users don’t see a "default" page before it adapts.

5. Faster TTFP (Time to First Paint)

SSR gives you the advantage of shipping ready-to-paint HTML, which can significantly reduce TTFP and First Contentful Paint (FCP), especially over slow networks or on budget devices.

CSR needs to download JS, parse, execute, and then render content.
SSR skips all that and gives the browser paint-ready markup.

Of course, you still need to optimize server latency (e.g., caching, prefetching), but the user gets content on-screen faster.

6. Real-Time or Frequently Updating Content

If you're building pages where data changes often (e.g., news headlines, stock tickers, dashboards), SSR can fetch the latest data server-side and deliver an up-to-date view, without relying on the client to fetch and rehydrate it after load.

You get fresh content straight from the server without API staleness or “loading shimmer fatigue.”

Trade-offs of SSR (It’s Not a Free Lunch)

Like any architectural choice, SSR comes with its own set of trade-offs. Use it where it makes sense, but be aware of what you’re signing up for.

🐌 Server Latency

SSR depends on server response time. If your backend is slow, the entire page is blocked. You’ll need to optimize API calls and sometimes parallelize data fetching to avoid bottlenecks.

❄️ Cold Starts (especially with serverless)

Using SSR on serverless platforms like Vercel or AWS Lambda? Be ready for cold start latency, especially if you’re not using edge functions or keeping functions warm.

🧠 More DevOps Complexity

SSR introduces infrastructure overhead: caching strategies, CDN config, monitoring server-side errors, etc. It’s not just “throw it on Netlify and forget it.”

💻 Heavier Server Load

Rendering every request on the server increases CPU usage, especially on high-traffic pages. Without proper caching (e.g., full-page or API response cache), costs can escalate fast.

🧩 Hydration Overhead

After the HTML is painted, the client still needs to hydrate the page to enable interactivity, so SSR doesn’t remove JS from the equation; it just moves some responsibility around.

Summary

🔍 SSR vs CSR – Quick Comparison

Feature / Criteria	SSR (Server-Side Rendering)	CSR (Client-Side Rendering)
Initial Load Speed	Faster Time to First Paint (TTFP) due to pre-rendered HTML	Slower TTFP; JS must load, parse, and execute first
SEO Friendliness	✅ Excellent – content is crawlable by default	⚠️ Needs extra setup (hydration, SSR fallback, pre-rendering)
Personalization	✅ Easy via server logic before sending HTML	Needs client-side fetching post-load
Secret Handling	✅ Safe (tokens/keys stay on server)	❌ Exposing secrets is a risk
Client Device Load	Lighter – server does the heavy lifting	Heavier – browser must render and hydrate
Operational Complexity	Higher – requires server infra, caching, cold-start handling	Lower – static hosting possible
Subsequent Navigation	Full-page reloads unless hybrid/hydration is added	✅ Smooth SPA-like transitions
Interactivity	Needs hydration post-load	Fully interactive once JS loads
Best For	SEO pages, landing pages, dashboards with sensitive data	SPAs, internal tools, highly interactive UIs

Conclusion: Use SSR With Purpose

SSR is powerful—but not a one-size-fits-all solution.

Use it when:

You care about SEO and fast first paint.
You’re dealing with sensitive data or want to reduce client-side API calls.
Personalization or real-time freshness matters.
You want to keep secrets, secrets.

Don’t use it just because it’s trendy. Understand the trade-offs, evaluate what your app needs, and architect with purpose, not buzzwords.

TL;DR: SSR is great for SEO, personalization, and performance, but brings complexity. Use it where it solves a real problem, not just because it’s shiny.

If you have reached here, then I have made a satisfactory effort to keep you reading. Please be kind enough to leave any comments or share corrections.

DEV Community