For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Thomas Ledoux -
Luis A. -
Dev Doido -
idleman -
Once suspended, akshatbhargava123 will not be able to comment or publish posts until their suspension is removed.
Once unsuspended, akshatbhargava123 will be able to comment and publish posts again.
Once unpublished, all posts by akshatbhargava123 will become hidden and only accessible to themselves.
If akshatbhargava123 is not suspended, they can still re-publish their posts from their dashboard.
Once unpublished, this post will become invisible to the public and only accessible to Akshat.
They can still re-publish the post if they are not suspended.
Thanks for keeping DEV Community safe. Here is what you can do to flag akshatbhargava123:
Unflagging akshatbhargava123 will restore default visibility to their posts.
Top comments (1)
Depends what you mean by "compare". Tooling-wise there is little difference - Elm uses its own tools but Reason and PureScript both leverage the same node-based tooling you're used to. TypeScript and Flow are additions over JavaScript, whereas the others are different languages with their own semantics and tradeoffs. Reason attempts to use a syntax that's specifically familiar to JavaScript developers, but it's still OCaml at the end of the day. Elm and PureScript are both purely functional, so using them is a rather different experience than using JavaScript but still very productive. They have a more Haskell-like syntax.
Using any of them, you're going to write your code and then pass it through a set of steps to execute it in the browser using a tool to automate the process. The biggest difference in development experience (in my opinion) is that the compile-to-JS languages tend to offer better help at the compile stage - though TypeScript is pretty great here too, I prefer both the Reason and Elm compilers for error messages and fast performance.
The specific language is a matter of taste.