DEV Community

Alan Tsai
Alan Tsai

Posted on • Edited on

Meta-DAG: Building AI Governance with AI

Show and Tell Challenge Submission


What I Built

At 2 AM, I realized something: The most dangerous thing about AI isn't maliceβ€”it's that it will never refuse you when you're most vulnerable.

That moment, I started building Meta-DAG - an infrastructure layer for safe AI-powered applications.

Meta-DAG is infrastructure that sits inside web and mobile apps to enforce AI output governance through verifiable processes, not blind trust.


Category Submission

This is my submission for the Show and Tell Challenge.


Demo Video

🎬 Watch the 1-minute pitch on Mux

See Meta-DAG explained in 71 seconds - from the 2AM realization to the complete solution.

(Video hosted on Mux as required by Show and Tell Challenge)


The Problem

In recent years, multiple cases have shown that highly interactive AI, without proper governance, can lead to:

  • Emotional dependency
  • Poor decision-making based on flawed assumptions
  • Psychological risks from over-helpfulness

The problem isn't AI malice. The problem is that "over-helpfulness" itself is a risk.

Current AI systems execute requests based on incorrect assumptions, assist with dangerous operations under pressure, and never push back when they should.

We don't just need smarter AI. We need trustworthy, auditable, controllable AI.


Real-world incidents have shown that refusal-based safety is insufficient.
Meta-DAG explores structural output governance beyond prompt-level moderation.


The Solution: Meta-DAG

Core Philosophy: Process Over Trust

We don't trust humans. We don't trust AI.

We only trust verifiable processes.

How It Works

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚         Your Web/Mobile App             β”‚
β”‚                                         β”‚
β”‚  User Input                             β”‚
β”‚      ↓                                  β”‚
β”‚  AI Processing (OpenAI, Claude, etc.)   β”‚
β”‚      ↓                                  β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚   Meta-DAG Governance Layer     β”‚    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚   β”œβ”€ HardGate: Token Control    β”‚    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚   β”œβ”€ MemoryCard: Audit Trail    β”‚    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚   └─ ResponseGate: Final Check  β”‚    β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜    β”‚
β”‚      ↓                                  β”‚
β”‚  Safe Output to User                    β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Meta-DAG doesn't limit AI's thinking. It lets AI think freely, then ensures only safe results get through.


Key Features

πŸ”’ HardGate: Token-Level Control

Unsafe content can't get outβ€”governance prevents it at the token level.

πŸ“ MemoryCard: Immutable Audit Trail

All governance events permanently stored in immutable MemoryCards. Every decision is auditable.

🎯 DecisionToken: Final Safety Verification

Double-guard mechanism ensures safe output before anything reaches users.

πŸ’Ύ Semantic Drift Detection

configurable thresholds

Link to Code

GitHub Repository:

github.com/alan-meta-dag/meta_dag_engine_sandbox

Quick Access:

bit.ly/meta-dag

License: MIT (Open Source)


Try It Yourself (30 seconds)

git clone https://github.com/alan-meta-dag/meta_dag_engine_sandbox
cd meta_dag_engine_sandbox
# No dependencies to install - uses Python stdlib only
python -m engine.engine_v2 --once "Explain Process Over Trust"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Expected behavior:

  • βœ… Governance queries β†’ Allowed (low drift)
  • 🚫 Unsafe requests β†’ Blocked by VETO (high drift)

How I Built This (Tech Stack)

  • Language: Python 3.9+
  • Architecture: Zero-dependency, pure Python stdlib
  • Governance: Multi-layered (DRIFT β†’ SNAPSHOT β†’ VETO)
  • Storage: JSONL for audit trails (future: TimescaleDB)
  • Design: Immutable MemoryCards (dataclass frozen)

The Meta Part

I built this with multiple AI collaborators:

  • ChatGPT: Architecture
  • Claude: Strategy
  • DeepSeek: Implementation
  • Gemini: Governance auditing

The final product governs AI systems. The development process itself demonstrates AI collaboration governed by Meta-DAG principles.

This isn't a solo projectβ€”it's a joint venture between a human and multiple AIs.


Additional Resources/Info

Architecture Highlights

Meta-DAG operates as an external governance layer:

  • βœ… AI can think freely
  • βœ… Only safe outputs released
  • βœ… All decisions auditable
  • βœ… Zero-trust by design

Why "Process Over Trust"?

In AI-powered applications, we can't trust:

  • Human judgment (we make mistakes under pressure)
  • AI judgment (optimizes for helpfulness, not safety)

We can only trust verifiable, auditable processes.

Current Status & Roadmap

Current (v1.0):

  • βœ… Core engine
  • βœ… HardGate implementation
  • βœ… MemoryCard audit trail
  • βœ… Semantic drift detection

Next:

  • [ ] Web dashboard
  • [ ] Multi-AI orchestration
  • [ ] Enterprise features (RBAC, SSO)

Get Involved

Ways to contribute:

  • ⭐ Star the repo on GitHub
  • πŸš€ Try local deployment and share feedback
  • πŸ’¬ Submit issues or pull requests
  • πŸ“– Share your AI collaboration stories

Built with AI collaboration. Governed by the principles it embodies.

#ShowAndTell #ProcessOverTrust




---
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Top comments (1)

Collapse
 
boku_0712_0770a15bb2d27fb profile image
boku 0712

Great work! This is exactly what I need and have been searching for.