If you’ve tried to use Stripe Entitlements for anything beyond basic feature flags, you’ve probably had the same reaction I did:
“Wait… this doesn’t actually solve the hard parts.”
This post is not another Stripe tutorial. It’s a reality check based on building real SaaS products — especially AI‑heavy ones — where limits, overrides, and real‑time enforcement actually matter.
What Stripe Entitlements Actually Are
Stripe Entitlements are best understood as metadata attached to billing objects.
At a high level:
- Attach a feature to a product or price
- When a subscription changes, Stripe emits a webhook
- Your app interprets the new state
That’s it.
They are:
- ✅ Boolean (on/off)
- ❌ Not quantitative
- ❌ Not real‑time
- ❌ Not customer‑override friendly
This is not a knock on Stripe — it’s simply not what they built them for.
Where Things Start Breaking
Let’s look at very common SaaS scenarios.
1. Usage-based limits
“Pro plan gets 50,000 tokens per month.”
Stripe Entitlements have no concept of usage accumulation. You still have to:
- Track usage yourself
- Enforce limits yourself
- Decide what happens at the edge (block? overage? upsell?)
Stripe will gladly bill. It will not help you decide.
2. Real-time enforcement
Webhooks are eventually consistent.
In practice that means:
- User upgrades plan
- Stripe fires webhook seconds (or minutes) later
- Your system processes it
Meanwhile:
- Your backend still sees the old entitlement state
- Your frontend may show the wrong access
For AI, infra, or quota-heavy products, this gap is unacceptable.
3. Customer-level overrides
Real products always need exceptions:
- Give a customer early access
- Temporarily raise a limit
- Grandfather old users
- Comp a specific account
Stripe Entitlements are product-scoped, not customer-scoped.
Once you step outside the happy path, you’re back to building custom logic.
The Uncomfortable Truth
After shipping multiple SaaS products, I landed on this conclusion:
Stripe is a billing ledger, not a pricing or entitlement system.
And that’s okay — but pretending otherwise leads to brittle architectures.
Every serious team I know ended up building:
- A separate entitlement store
- Their own real-time enforcement
- Custom override logic
Stripe stayed in the loop for billing only.
What Actually Works Better
The pattern that scales looks like this:
- Stripe handles money
- Your system owns entitlements
- Usage is evaluated in real time
- Overrides are first-class concepts
Once you separate those responsibilities, everything becomes simpler:
- No guesswork around webhooks
- Clear entitlement snapshots
- Deterministic behavior at request time
Why I Ended Up Building PriceOS
After repeating this pattern across products, I stopped trying to bend billing tools into entitlement engines.
I built PriceOS to handle:
- Feature and limit entitlements
- Real-time enforcement
- Customer-specific overrides
- Non-Stripe plans (lifetime deals, enterprise, promos)
Stripe still powers billing — exactly where it shines.
If you’re running into the same walls, that separation is the unlock.
If you’ve fought with pricing, entitlements, or usage logic before, I’d love to hear how you solved it. Most teams quietly reinvent the same system — this just makes it explicit.
Top comments (0)