Fellow designers, let's talk about something solid today. You've all seen Gurman's leak: Apple's first foldable phone, the iPhone Ultra, priced above $2,000, described as "ten years of grinding to sharpen one sword." What deserves a designer's attention isn't the price — it's why Apple dared to spend ten years sharpening a folding screen.
Put plainly: while the Android camp is already competing on "crease depth" and "weight and thickness," Apple chose a clumsier but more durable path — making every open and close of the foldable feel like opening a hardcover book, not bending a plastic board.
What the News Says
Briefly: according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple plans to launch its first foldable phone in 2026, named the iPhone Ultra, priced above $2,000. It's not only the most expensive phone in Apple's history but also its longest product development cycle — ten full years from project start to mass production.
What does ten years mean? It means at least three or four prototype generations were killed internally; it means countless "tear it down and start over" cycles in hinge, display, and software interaction. More importantly, Gurman notes Apple is developing an "almost invisible crease" technology and a composite glass that is "more scratch-resistant than existing foldable screens."
Three Design Takeaways from an Industrial Design Perspective
1. Hinge Design: From "Structural Compromise" to "Experience Sovereignty"
Android foldable hinges have evolved through several generations — from the earliest "U-shape" to today's "teardrop" — and creases have genuinely gotten shallower. But a fundamental problem remains: the hinge serves the act of folding, not the state of being unfolded.
Apple's design logic may be entirely different. According to patent filings, Apple is developing a "self-healing" hinge structure — not that the material repairs itself, but that the hinge's damping system adjusts automatically to the usage scenario. Flip it open one-handed and the damping lightens; fix the screen at an angle to watch video and the damping locks. It sounds like a detail, but it's actually a difference in design philosophy. Android makers pursue "as thin as a slab phone when folded"; Apple pursues "as stable as a tablet when unfolded." For industrial designers, the latter is the more advanced proposition.
2. Screen Material: Why Is Apple Still Grinding Away at Glass?
Today's foldables use either CPI (colorless polyimide) or UTG (ultra-thin glass) for the inner display. CPI is soft but scratches easily; UTG is hard but shatters. Apple's approach: fuse the two into a "composite glass."
From a design standpoint, this answers a fundamental question: should a foldable phone have a screen protector or not? Android makers say "better to apply one"; Apple says "not needed." Apple's screen design has always centered on "direct touch" as a core competency — if the foldable's inner display needs a protector to be usable, Apple would consider that a design failure. So Apple is working to give the screen material itself both "scratch resistance + flexibility," which requires redesigning the glass's molecular structure and even changing the glass forming process. It sounds distant, but once achieved, the foldable unboxing experience will say goodbye to "fragility" for good.
3. The Weight and Thickness Trade-Off: Will Apple Chase "Thin and Light"?
The lightest foldables today are around 230g with folded thickness under 11mm. If Apple makes a foldable, it most likely won't compete for that "lightest and thinnest" title.
Why? Because Apple defines "feel" differently. Android's thin-and-light often comes with "sharp edges" and "unstable balance," while Apple cares more about "weight distribution in the hand." Look at the iPhone 15 Pro Max: not light, but through edge curvature and lowered center of gravity, it feels better in hand than many lighter phones.
For a foldable, Apple will likely do two things: shift the center of gravity toward the palm (by arranging battery and hinge), and shape the body as "thick in the middle, thin at the edges" so the folded feel is more like a "pebble" than a "brick."
What Designers Can Take Away
The biggest lesson from this news: when everyone is sprinting in the same direction, the designer who stops to ask "why" often builds more durable products.
In the foldable category, the Android camp's "race" is essentially supply-chain driven: however thin the display supplier can make it, however small the hinge supplier can make it, that's what gets stacked. Apple's "ten years of grinding" is using design to define the supply chain: this is the hinge I need, this is the display I need — you go develop them.
For our day-to-day product design, this means three things:
- Don't let the supply chain limit your imagination. Define the experience you want first, then find the path to build it — not the other way around.
- "Design redundancy" isn't waste — it's future compatibility. Apple is willing to spend two extra years for an "almost invisible crease" — that's exactly where product vitality comes from.
- Feel is mystique, but it's even more science. Don't just read thickness and weight off a spec sheet — touch it, hold it, feel the weight distribution. That's what users experience every day.
FAQ
Q: Why is Apple's foldable called "Ultra" instead of "Fold" or "Flip"?
A: The naming reveals the positioning difference. "Fold" and "Flip" emphasize the folding action itself, while "Ultra" emphasizes "beyond": beyond existing phone forms, beyond existing screen experiences. It also confirms Apple won't make a simple "folding iPhone" but a new product category — similar to the leap from iPod to iPhone.
Q: How does Apple's "almost invisible crease" differ from Samsung's and Huawei's?
A: The core difference is the implementation path. Samsung and Huawei mainly "hide" the crease by optimizing hinge structure — a teardrop hinge gives the display a larger bend radius, for example. Apple's patents suggest they may add a "stress buffer layer" between display layers so the crease region is physically resistant to permanent deformation. Simply put: Android "conceals" the crease; Apple "prevents" it.
Q: As a product designer, what should I learn from this news?
A: Three keywords: definition rights (don't let the supply chain define your product), redundancy thinking (leave design margin for future experiences), and feel engineering (treat center of gravity, curvature, and damping — those "soft parameters" — as hard targets). The foldable is just the surface; the design philosophy behind it is what's truly worth taking away.
Source: Gurman leak — Apple's first foldable iPhone Ultra, "ten years in the making," priced above $2,000 (ITHome). Adapted from the Hezi Industrial Design official website (hezidesign.com), "Industry News" column.
Top comments (0)