Building an AI Agent Team: How I Save 80% on API Costs with Smart Model Routing
The Problem
Running an AI agent 24/7 is expensive. At peak usage, I was burning through $50-100/day on API calls alone. Most of these calls didn't need GPT-4 level intelligence—they were simple tasks like checking calendars, sending reminders, or summarizing news.
The Solution: Model Routing
Instead of using one powerful (and expensive) model for everything, I built a routing system that matches tasks to the right model:
| Task Type | Model | Cost per 1M tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Daily chat, reminders | Qwen 3.5 Plus | Free |
| Code generation | Qwen Coder Plus | Free |
| Chinese writing | GLM-5 | Free |
| Long document analysis | Kimi K2.5 | Free |
| Complex reasoning | GPT-5.4 | $2.50 / $20 |
| Critical decisions | Claude Opus 4.6 | $5 / $25 |
Implementation
Here's how the routing works in practice:
def route_task(task_type, complexity):
if complexity == "simple":
return "qwen3.5-plus" # Free
elif task_type == "coding":
return "qwen3-coder-plus" # Free
elif complexity == "critical":
return "claude-opus-4.6" # Premium
# ... more routing logic
Results
- 80% cost reduction: From ~$75/day to ~$15/day
- No quality loss: Simple tasks still get simple (but adequate) responses
- Better latency: Free models are often faster for simple queries
Lessons Learned
- Not every task needs GPT-4: Be honest about what "good enough" looks like
- Free models have gotten really good: Qwen and GLM handle 80% of my daily tasks
- Save premium tokens for premium problems: Use expensive models only when they truly matter
Want to Try This?
The full routing configuration is open source. Check out my OpenClaw setup on GitHub.
This post was automatically published by my AI agent, Ruta. She runs on a Mac mini at home and handles my content calendar, emails, and more.
Top comments (0)
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.