Flexbox diehards: Here's some concrete examples of when CSS grid is just better

This blog post introduces several new terms you may be unfamiliar with: griddazzle, gridify, getting "griddy" with it, etc. I recommend using context clues for these definitions.

I'll be honest, I was a flexbox diehard myself a while after CSS Grid took hold of page layouts. Even after taking Wes Bos' CSS Grid course (still the best resource hands-down if you're new to Grid!), I just didn't see the need to change my ways. Sure, flexbox sometimes needs an extra <div> or two to get layouts working... but hey, if it ain't broke, why fix it?

Still, I slowly forced myself to implement CSS Grid in some choice areas of my websites. Now, after a year of experimenting and getting increasingly Griddy with it, I've found some neat corners of CSS where flexbox struggles by comparison.

Posts comparing flexbox to Grid sometimes use simplified examples that don't get to the heart of flexbox's flaws. So, to convince all you flexers out there to join the dark side, here's some concrete examples of when CSS Grid really is alot simpler in my own experience.

1. When layouts have some reordering to do

Let's consider a common scenario: you have a 2 column layout for desktop / laptop users, and you want it to wrap nicely to a single column for narrow screens.

Taking a quick glance at your team's mockups, you fly into your usual flex rhythm and end up here:

<div class="outer-container">
    <div>...column 1 content</div>
    <div>...column 2 content</div>
</div>

<style>
    .outer-container {
        /* create flexbox with a single row */
        display: flex;
        justify-content: space-between;
    }

    @media (max-width: 800px) {
        .outer-container {
            /* wrap columns on top of each other for mobile */
            flex-direction: column;

            /* alternatively, you can remove the flexbox entirely
            and let the columns wrap naturally */
            display: block;
        }
    }
</style>

Easy peasy! For a lot of use cases, this should work just fine.

But sometimes, your design team my have other ideas. Let's consider the layout below, with both a desktop and mobile mockup to implement:

Well, that's a lot less fun. Not only should we reverse the ordering of our header and image, but we also need to move the final element of the first column (the "find us in person" address) to the end of our second column. This is definitely a nail in our flexbox coffin 😕

Time to gridazzle

Fear not! CSS grid has an elegant solution to the problem: grid template areas ✨

With this tool, we can assign each HTML element a unique "area" in our layout. then, we let our grid container decide where to slap each area into our final layout. It's a lot like paint-by-numbers, but gridified.

Here's a sample of how we could implement the above layout:

<!-- First, put all our elements on the page. -->
<!-- Notice we don't need wrapper <div>s for each column anymore! -->
<div class="outer-container">
    <h1>Contact Us</h1>
    <p class="tagline-text">Want to learn more...</p>
    <img src="/static/contact-us.jpg" alt="People flying around with laptops" />
    <div class="address-container">...</div>
    <form>...</form>
</div>


<style>
  .outer-container {
    display: grid;
    /* use template-areas to define the structure of our 2 column page */
    /*                                        col 1 | col 2                                                          */
    grid-template-areas:  "header   header" /* row 1 (just the header h1) */
                          "tagline  form" /* row 2 (tagline text, start of form) */
                          "image    form" /* row 3 (image, form continues) */
                          "address  form"; /* row 4 (address, end of form) */
  }
  /* assign each element to  a unique area on our grid */
  h1 {
        grid-area: header;
  }
  p.tagline-text {
    grid-area: tagline;
  }
  img {
    grid-area: image;
  }
  form {
    grid-area: form;
  }
  .address-container {
    grid-area: address;
  }

  @media (max-width: 800px) {
    .outer-container {
      /* rearrange our grid on mobile, now using a 1 column layout */
      grid-template-areas: "image"
                           "header"
                           "tagline"
                           "form"
                           "address";
    }
  }
</style>

Nice! Not only can we define the positioning of elements however we want, but we even have an expressive explanation of the layout in our CSS using area names.

Of course, we'll need a few finishing touches to get all the spacing right (height of each row in our 2 column grid, spacing between the columns, etc.). So, if you're curious how the entire mockup was accomplished, you can check out a production-ready implementation on our GitHub repo for bitsofgood.org 😁

Accessibility note: CSS grid changes the visual order of elements on the page, but not the actual order of elements in the DOM. So, when we wrap our address-container to the bottom on mobile, it still appears above the form element in the underlying HTML. This shouldn't be much of an issue in our case, but before you start reordering text boxes on our own site, make sure this won't confuse screen readers!

2. When you want things kind of centered

I've run into this a few times trying to make a nice container of "cards," dynamically wrapping to a new row depending on the screen width. This conundrum is awkward to explain with words, so let's understand the problem visually:

Okay, so our container of cards should always remain centered on the page (notice the white space on either side of our card grid). However, each row of our container should start at the leftmost side and continue to the right (aka flex-start). That means we can't simply use justify-content: center here! That would center the item in the last row relative to the other rows, which breaks our illusion of a "grid."

Oh, and we also want constant "gap" between each card, as well as a constant width for each card.

If you've attempted this layout before, you can probably predict the @media query adjustments we'll need. Here's a sample implementation, assuming we'll never need more than 3 columns. Click "edit on CodePen" if you wish to squoosh that browser window.

Why this implementation is bad

1. We need a @media query to adjust our container width for each change in column-count. This requires some wacky mental math based on a) the width of each card, and b) the margin between elements. Adjusting the width of a card by even 1px, we'll need to run all these calculations again! And no, we can't use calc() in a media query 😑
2. This doesn't consider screen sizes below the width of a single card. We could add yet another @media query to change this, but as we'll see soon, CSS Grid can remove this need entirely!

Time to gridificate

Now, let's see a sample implementation of the same layout with CSS grid:

.container-of-cards {
  display: grid;
  /* set our column widths with wrapping in place */
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 340px);
  gap: 60px;
  /* center our columns relative to the container */
  justify-content: center;
  /* add a max-width to prevent more than 3 columns */
  max-width: 1200px;
  margin: auto;
}

.card {
  height: 120px;
  /* no need to specify the width or margins! CSS grid does it all for us. */
}

Some big takeaways here...

1. grid-template-columns lets us create as many columns as we can fit in a given container. In our case, we want to create columns 340px wide, and auto-fill our container with however many cards we have (wrapping to a new row as necessary).

2. justify-content works a bit differently in Grid land. Rather than changing the alignment within each row a-la Flexbox, it actually adjusts the alignment of the entire Grid container relative to the page; exactly what we wanted! As an FYI, Grid uses a separate property called justify-items to align items within a row.

3. Grid can assign the gap between items in our container, essentially applying margins between each element. This is an absolute godsend that's worth explaining in its own section!

Considering screen widths below 340px

As mentioned previously, flexbox usually needs an extra @media query to shrink our layout for smaller screen sizes. Thankfully, CSS offers yet another magical operator for this: minmax ✨

.container-of-cards {
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, minmax(max-content, 340px));
  ...
}

Breaking this down: the first parameter represents the minimum width each grid item can have, and the second represents the maximum width we should try to reach. In our case, we want cards to be 340px wide if possible, but shrink to 100% the width of the screen for layouts < 340px wide. In Grid land, we use max-content to represent this minimum.

2.5 When you want that "gap"

This is a frustrating one: we want to apply a constant margin between each element in a row, but not a margin at the start and end of the row.

Here's an example of the problem, taken from the Bits of Good projects page:

With our old-guild flex knowledge, we might end up with this rough layout:

<div class="outer-container">
  <div class="card">...card 1 content</div>
  <div class="card">...card 2 content</div>
  ...
</div>

<style>
  .card {
    width: 340px;
    /* add margins to either side of each card, totalling to a 60px "gap" */
    margin: 30px;
  }
  ...
</style>

This almost gets us where we want, but we end up with this awkward margin on either side of the flexbox. With a header in place, our layout gets a little out-of-wack.

If there are other sections on our page following the max-width: 1200px rule, this margin issue will get even more obvious!

We have a few options to remedy this...

1. Swallow up that offset with some negative margins on either side of our outer-container. This is an okay band-aid to our issue, but it's not a super readable solution. For example, what if we want a margin around our grid of cards for mobile layouts, and no margin for wider layouts? We could write this as margin: -30px -> margin: 0, but that's not super readable / doesn't spark joy in some devs' opinions.
2. Scrap the margin and use margin-right: 60px on every card. This requires some nth-child acrobatics to remove the margin on the last item in each row, which only gets worse as the number of columns changes 💀

...Or, we can just use Grid! As we saw in our last solution, Grid allows you to define the gap between elements from the parent container. You can even define a separate gap between rows and columns.

.container-of-cards {
  display: grid;
  /* gap between rows */
  row-gap: 60px;
  /* gap between columns in a row */
  column-gap: 120px;
  /* same card setup as our last example */
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, minmax(max-content, 340px));
}

3. When you want that collage effect

This is a hallmark CSS Grid feature you've probably seen by now, but it's definitely worth repeating.

Say you're making a photo gallery of some kind. Instead of making rows of cards with uniform widths and heights, you want to add some snazzy dynamics to emphasize your favorite pics 📸

Here's one of my favorite examples of this end goal:

I could attempt this layout with flexbox... but I don't think 1000 lines of div adjustments and @media queries is very productive. In any case, you'd probably shoot down your designer's dreams entirely in a pre-Grid society.

You can see the completed Pen to absorb all the Griddy goodness. The biggest takeaway I want to pull out here is Grid's concept of "span:"

.container {
  /* make a gridified container with 4 columns,
  each 25% of the container width (denoted by fr / fractional units) */
  grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);
  /* don't specify how many rows (let everything auto-wrap) */
}

img.thicc {
  /* let this image span 2 columns (wider than it is tall),
  starting at the first column */
  grid-column: 1 / span 2;
  grid-row: 1;
}

img.tall {
  grid-column: 2;
  /* let this image span 2 rows (taller than it is wide),
  starting at the third row */
  grid-row: 3 / span 2;
}

Some big takeaways here...

1. Grid lets you specify column widths using "factional units," or frs. These are basically identify to flex units, except the container is charge of specifying them. This saves a lot of trouble when you want every element to obey a common unit.
2. You can allow each element on the grid to follow the specified rows and columns with no modification (each will span 1 column, 1 row by default), or...
3. You can add some span styling for spicy dynamics 🌶. This gives us a neat collage effect.

There are countless examples of Grid-heavy layouts to expand your realm of stylesheet possibilities. This collection of Pens is a great place to start!

Learn a little something?

Awesome. In case you missed it, I launched an my "web wizardry" newsletter to explore more knowledge nuggets like this!

This thing tackles the "first principles" of web development. In other words, what are all the janky browser APIs, bent CSS rules, and semi-accessible HTML that make all our web projects tick? If you're looking to go beyond the framework, this one's for you dear web sorcerer 🔮

Subscribe away right here. I promise to always teach and never spam ❤️

Comments

[Ronak Jethwa]

What I check before applying Grid vs Flex is if my layout is unidirectional or bi-directional. If bi-directional, always prefer Grid. Otherwise Flex would work just fine!

This one is a great post on Grid vs Flex.
css-irl.info/to-grid-or-to-flex/

[Ben Holmes]

Wow, that post is an awesome find! Really summarizes some expert viewpoints on how to think about Grid over flexbox. I'll be sure to use that terminology in the future 😁

[rootfs.ext2.gz]

I've never even heard of grids (I admit, I'm not that great with front-end) and you've just 100% sold me on it.

Great job, and great post! Really entertaining and educational!

[Giorgos Apostolopoulos]

THANK YOU. Number 2 has been my sleep paralysis demon for a while now, working only with flexbox. Excellent article!

[Giorgos Kontopoulos 👀]

Great article. The grid system can easily do layouts that flexbox struggles. Still in many layouts flexbox is the simplest solution. If grid is needed for me the decision usually comes down to IE11 support. Grid mostly does not work with this old browser so when I have a choice with flexbox I prefer it instead of messing with polyfills and hacks.

For example in the case of non simple area reorderings (point 1. above) I can usually use nested flexboxes to solve it.

[Pacharapol Withayasakpunt]

Currently, I am currently looking for custom gaps. Maybe something along the lines of,

span + span::before {
  content: " · ";
}

Now, how do I make it responsive? Like vertical on <= 600px. 2 x n on > 600px.

[Sean Allin Newell]

I think you just gridified my brain.

Your first example of template area really clicked for me. 👏

[Ishan Srivastava]

This is so cool 😍 , I used to make a custom Angular Directive to fix the pitfalls encountered when using flex. Seems like grid was the solution. Thanks for the post. 👍