*A developer's honest look at using Generative AI (Vidnoz) to automate documentation and demo videos.
*
We’ve all been there. You ship a new feature. The code is clean, the tests pass, and the PR is merged.
But now comes the dreaded part: *Updating the Documentation.
*
Written docs are fine, but in 2025, users want video walkthroughs. And let’s be real—recording your screen, fighting with OBS settings, and editing out your "umms" and "ahhs" in DaVinci Resolve is a massive time sink.
I hated it. So, I looked for a way to automate it.
I needed a solution that could:
- Take a text script (which I can version control).
- Generate a professional "talking head" video.
- Cost $0 for my side projects.
I tested the usual suspects (Synthesia, HeyGen), but their free tiers are too restrictive for dev work. Then I found Vidnoz AI.
Here is my workflow for turning markdown into video documentation in under 5 minutes.
(Full disclosure: I tested this tool extensively. You can see my full benchmark and video quality comparison here.)
The Problem with Manual Video
- **As a developer, manual video creation breaks my flow state.
- It’s not versioned: If the UI changes, I have to re-record the entire video.
- It’s not scalable: Recording 10 videos takes 10x the effort of recording 1.
- **It’s awkward: **I don’t want to be on camera at 2 AM when I’m shipping code.
The AI Solution: "Video as Code"
Vidnoz AI treats video generation like a compilation step. You provide the source (text), and it compiles the binary (MP4).
**1. The "Avatar" as a Variable
**Instead of filming yourself, you select an AI avatar. Vidnoz has 1900+ of them.
For my docs, I use a "Tech Presenter" avatar.
- **Pros: **Always looks professional, consistent lighting, never has a bad hair day.
- **Cons: **Cannot do extreme emotions (but for docs, neutral/happy is perfect).
**2. Text-to-Speech (TTS) Engine
**The TTS engine is the compiler. I write my script in plain text.
- "Click on the 'Settings' tab in the top right corner."
- "Then, paste your API key into the field." Vidnoz generates the audio instantly. The lip-sync is generated procedurally to match the phonemes. It’s surprisingly accurate.
**3. Localization (i18n)
**This is the killer feature.
If I want to support Spanish users, I don't need to hire a translator. I just translate my text script (using GPT-4) and change the "Voice Language" setting in Vidnoz.
- The avatar now speaks Spanish.
- The lip-sync automatically adjusts to Spanish phonemes.
- Cost: $0. Effort: 30 seconds.
My "Docs-to-Video" Workflow
Here is the exact process I use now:
- Write the Script: I write the walkthrough script in Notion or VS Code.
- Screenshots: I t ake clean screenshots of the UI steps.
Vidnoz Studio:
- I select a "Tutorial" template (16:9 aspect ratio).
- I paste my script into the text box.
- I upload my UI screenshots as the background.
Generate: Click "Generate."
**
**Embed: Download the MP4 and embed it in my README.md or documentation site.
Total time: ~5-8 minutes per video.
If the UI changes next week? I just swap the background screenshot and hit "Generate" again. No re-recording audio.
Is it "Production Ready"?
For marketing videos on a $10M ad budget? Maybe not yet (though it's close).
For Documentation, Tutorials, and Demos? Absolutely.
The "Freemium" model is also very dev-friendly. You can generate videos daily for free (watermarked), which is perfect for internal demos or MVP launches.
Conclusion
If you are still manually recording Loom videos for every minor feature update, you are wasting cycles. Treat video like code. Automate it.
I wrote a much deeper dive on my blog comparing the API limits, rendering speeds, and pricing of Vidnoz vs. competitors.
👉 Read the full technical review here
(I also included a discount code in the full review if you decide to upgrade to their Pro plan for higher resolution).
Happy shipping! 🚢
Top comments (0)