DEV Community

BuildOpsy
BuildOpsy

Posted on Originally published at buildopsy.com

🚀Rocket thrusters on a car

Tesla promised rocket thrusters on a car. Naturally, the next step is to ask the engineers what the physics has to say about that.

Marketing has a wonderful relationship with the future. Engineering has a slightly less romantic relationship with mass, thrust, pressure, and the laws of physics.

So we audited the Tesla Roadster’s thruster claims as an engineering problem, not a headline-writing competition.

What’s theoretically possible? What has actually been demonstrated? What does the available evidence support, and where does the gap between a claim and a verified capability begin?

Because there’s a rather important difference between a technology that could work in principle and one that has been demonstrated to work as advertised.

We went through the claims, examined the evidence, and separated the physics from the promises.

Turns out, “the laws of physics don’t forbid it” and “the product can actually do it” are two very different engineering milestones.

A useful reminder that even when your company builds rockets, the burden of proof doesn’t magically disappear when you put the word Tesla on the slide.

Full engineering audit: https://buildopsy.com/system-design/tesla-roadster-thruster-claims-audit.html

Top comments (0)