DEV Community

Cover image for Conducting a Full Security Audit
code performance
code performance

Posted on

Conducting a Full Security Audit

#security #programming #testing

Conducting a full security audit is a critical step before deploying a production application. It's a comprehensive process that goes beyond automated scans to uncover potential vulnerabilities in your code, infrastructure, and dependencies.

Based on my initial assessment, your project has a strong security foundation. A full audit will help you build on that foundation and ensure your application is as secure as possible.

Here's a step-by-step guide on how you can conduct a full security audit for your project:

Phase 1: Preparation and Scoping

Before you start testing, you need to define the scope of the audit and gather all the necessary information.

  1. Define the Scope:

    • Applications: apps/web, apps/dev-tool
    • Packages: All packages in the packages directory, with a focus on those handling sensitive data or business logic (e.g., features/auth, billing, supabase).
    • Infrastructure: Your Supabase project, including the database, storage, and authentication.
    • CI/CD Pipeline: Your build and deployment process.

  2. Gather Documentation:

    • Collect any existing architecture diagrams, data flow diagrams, and security policies. If you don't have them, now is a good time to create them.

  3. Identify Key Assets:

    • Determine what you're trying to protect. This could include user data (PII), payment information, intellectual property, and the availability of your service.

Phase 2: Automated Scanning

Automated tools can help you quickly identify common vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.

  1. Static Application Security Testing (SAST):

    • SAST tools analyze your source code for potential vulnerabilities without running the application.
    • Recommendation: Integrate a SAST tool like Snyk Code, SonarQube, or GitHub Code Scanning into your CI/CD pipeline. These tools can automatically scan your code on every commit or pull request.

  2. Software Composition Analysis (SCA):

    • SCA tools scan your dependencies for known vulnerabilities. We already ran pnpm audit, but for a full audit, a more comprehensive tool is recommended.
    • Recommendation: Use Snyk Open Source, Dependabot, or a similar tool to continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when new vulnerabilities are discovered.

  3. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST):

    • DAST tools test your running application for vulnerabilities from the outside in.
    • Recommendation: Use a tool like OWASP ZAP (free) or Burp Suite to scan your application for common vulnerabilities like XSS, CSRF, and SQL injection.

Phase 3: Manual Penetration Testing

This is the most critical phase of the audit. It requires a security expert to manually test the application for vulnerabilities that automated tools might miss. You can perform this internally if you have the expertise, or hire a third-party security firm.

Here's a checklist of things to look for, based on the OWASP Top 10:

  • Broken Access Control:

    • Test every API endpoint and UI component to ensure that users can only access what they are authorized to. For example, can a regular user access the admin dashboard? Can a user from one team access the data of another team?
    • For this project: A line-by-line review of all Supabase RLS policies and the functions they depend on is crucial. Look for edge cases, logic flaws, and any situation where auth.uid() could be null or manipulated.

  • Cryptographic Failures:

    • Ensure all data is transmitted over HTTPS.
    • Verify that strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms are used.
    • Check for insecure storage of secrets. Ensure that secrets from .env files are not committed to the repository.

  • Injection:

    • Test all input fields for injection vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and SQL injection.
    • For this project: The use of Zod for schema validation is a great defense. Ensure that it's used consistently for all user-supplied data, and that there are no gaps in the validation logic.

  • Insecure Design:

    • Review the overall architecture for any design flaws. For example, are the password reset and invitation flows secure? Do they leak information?

  • Security Misconfiguration:

    • Check for any security misconfigurations in your Supabase project, such as default credentials, open ports, or unnecessary services.

  • Vulnerable and Outdated Components:

    • We covered this in the SCA section, but it's worth double-checking during the manual audit.

Phase 4: Reporting and Remediation

  1. Document Findings:

    • Create a detailed report of all the vulnerabilities you've found. For each vulnerability, include a description, its potential impact, and a recommendation for how to fix it.

  2. Prioritize Vulnerabilities:

    • Prioritize the vulnerabilities based on their severity (e.g., critical, high, medium, low).

  3. Create a Remediation Plan:

    • Create a plan to fix the vulnerabilities, starting with the most critical ones. Assign each vulnerability to a developer and track its progress.

Recommendation: Third-Party Security Audit

For a production application, it is highly recommended to hire a professional security firm to conduct an independent audit. They have the expertise, tools, and experience to find vulnerabilities that you might miss. An independent audit also provides a valuable third-party validation of your security posture, which can be important for building trust with your customers.

A security audit is not a one-time event. It's an ongoing process of testing, fixing, and improving your security posture. By following these steps, you can build a secure and reliable application that your users can trust.

Top comments (0)