Code review is the part of development that everyone agrees is important and nobody has time for. You can wait for a teammate to open your PR and respond sometime this week. Or you can let a local AI model give you a first pass in under a minute.
The catch used to be cost and data privacy. MonkeyCode, an open-source AI coding assistant, removes both by offering free models and a free server option you can run on your own machine. That combination means your code never leaves your laptop and your wallet stays shut.
Disclosure: This article was prepared as part of MonkeyCode's product outreach.
In this walkthrough, I'll show you how to build a tiny Python script that grabs a git diff, sends it to your local MonkeyCode server, and prints review comments. You'll end up with a reusable command that works on any repository.
Why run your own server?
Three reasons stand out.
- Privacy: your code stays on your machine. No third-party API receives your diff.
- Latency: the model runs locally, so you skip network round trips.
- Cost: the free tier is exactly $0.
There are trade-offs, and I'll cover them at the end. But for personal projects, internal tools, and quick sanity checks, this setup is hard to beat.
What you need
- Python 3.9 or newer
- Git
- MonkeyCode's server started locally (install instructions are in the project README)
- An API key from your local server — usually just a random string you set once
Nothing else. No cloud account, no credit card, no external service.
Step 1: Start the free server
After you install MonkeyCode, launch the server with whatever command the README currently recommends. It will likely look something like this:
monkeycode-server --port 8000
Keep that terminal open. The server now listens on localhost:8000 and exposes an OpenAI-compatible chat endpoint.
Step 2: Set environment variables
Point your script at the server with three variables.
export MONKEY_BASE="http://localhost:8000/v1"
export MONKEY_KEY="your-local-key"
export MONKEY_MODEL="" # check the server docs for the model identifier
Some servers use an empty model name to select the default. Others expect a specific string. The documentation will tell you exactly what to put in MONKEY_MODEL.
Step 3: Write the reviewer script
Create a file named review.py with the following content. This script does three things: it reads the latest diff from git, sends it to your local server, and prints the model's feedback.
import os
import subprocess
import requests
def get_diff():
result = subprocess.run(
["git", "diff", "HEAD~1", "--"],
capture_output=True,
text=True,
)
return result.stdout
def review(diff):
base = os.getenv("MONKEY_BASE")
key = os.getenv("MONKEY_KEY")
model = os.getenv("MONKEY_MODEL")
response = requests.post(
f"{base}/chat/completions",
headers={
"Authorization": f"Bearer {key}",
"Content-Type": "application/json",
},
json={
"model": model,
"messages": [
{
"role": "system",
"content": (
"You are a senior code reviewer. Be concise and specific. "
"Focus on bugs, security issues, and readability problems. "
"Suggest concrete fixes. Ignore style nitpicks unless they affect correctness."
),
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Review this diff:\n\n{diff}",
},
],
"temperature": 0.2,
},
)
response.raise_for_status()
return response.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]
if __name__ == "__main__":
diff = get_diff()
if diff.strip():
print(review(diff))
else:
print("No diff found. Are you on a git repository with at least one commit?")
The requests library is the only dependency. Install it once with pip install requests.
Step 4: Run it
From the root of any git repository, run:
python review.py
You'll see something like this printed to your terminal:
- Line 14: You're comparing `count` to a string. Use `int(count)` or change the type earlier.
- Line 22: The `except` block swallows all exceptions. Catch `ValueError` explicitly.
- Suggestion: extract the retry logic into a helper to make it testable.
Is this perfect? No. Is it a useful first pass before a human looks at the code? Absolutely.
Customizing the prompt
Your team's review style is unique. Adjust the system message to match it. For example, if you care about performance, add a line like:
"Flag any O(n²) patterns and suggest linear alternatives."
If you're reviewing a security-sensitive change, add:
"Highlight any place where user input reaches a shell command or a database query."
Tune the prompt until the output feels like a helpful colleague, not a nagging bot.
Turning it into a reusable command
You don't want to type python review.py every time. Add an alias to your shell config:
alias review-last='python ~/tools/review.py'
Or wire it into a Git alias:
git config --global alias.ai-review '!python ~/tools/review.py'
Now git ai-review works from anywhere in a repository.
You can also run it on a specific commit by changing the get_diff function. Replace HEAD~1 with a commit hash or a branch name like origin/main...HEAD to review only the changes in your working branch.
Decision table: should you use the free local server?
| Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Personal project, public code | Yes, great fit |
| Sensitive internal code | Yes, because it runs locally |
| High-volume CI pipeline with SLAs | No, use a paid hosted service |
| Team review process, non-critical | Maybe, as an asynchronous first pass |
| Non-technical user | No, you need to manage a server |
This table is a starting point. Your mileage depends on your tolerance for occasional weird model output.
Limitations
Be honest about what this setup does not give you.
- The free models have rate limits. They are fine for occasional diffs, not for thousands of requests per minute.
- Output quality is below the best commercial models. You will see false positives and missed bugs.
- There is no uptime guarantee. If the server crashes, you fix it yourself.
- Resource usage is on you. A local model can consume significant CPU and memory.
Who should not use this
- Teams that need enterprise-grade support or a formal SLA
- Developers who cannot monitor a local process in their environment
- Projects where a false negative means a regulatory violation
For those cases, a commercial API with a paid plan is the safer path. The free server is a learning tool, a privacy-friendly option, and a zero-cost starting point — not a replacement for every production need.
The takeaway
You do not need to wait for a human to catch obvious mistakes. With MonkeyCode's free models and free server, you can build a local AI reviewer in about ten minutes. You get privacy, zero cost, and a faster feedback loop.
Start on a side project. Run it on a small diff. Adjust the prompt until the comments feel useful. Then try it on your real work and see where it helps.
If you want a hands-on way to learn how local AI review feels, clone MonkeyCode's repo, start the free server, and run this script. Your future self — and your PR reviewers — will thank you.
Top comments (0)