DEV Community

Connie Baugher
Connie Baugher

Posted on

PTSD in the Workplace (Veterans in Tech): A Control-Systems View of Persistent Threat Processing

PTSD in the workplace is often misunderstood because it rarely looks like a visible crisis. In many veterans working in engineering, security, DevOps, or other high-responsibility technical roles, it behaves more like a persistent threat-processing service that keeps running even after the environment has changed.

You can be “fine” at work and still deal with system-level symptoms:

  • hypervigilance (continuous scanning for threat cues)
  • sleep disruption and circadian instability
  • cognitive overactivation (rumination, replay, scenario simulation)
  • exaggerated startle response
  • shutdown after conflict
  • performance oscillation (high-output bursts followed by depletion)

This isn’t a personality flaw. It’s a state problem.

A control-systems model (developer-native)

PTSD can be modeled as a persistence problem in a biological control system.

In healthy regulation, activation triggers action and the loop closes:

E(t) -> A(t) -> Threat decreases -> Baseline

Under sustained threat exposure, survival policies get compiled. If the system cannot reliably complete the action cycle, the signal persists:

E(t) -> ¬A(t) => E(t+1) increases

The load then spreads into other subsystems:

¬A(t) => C(t)↑ + V(t)↑ + S(t)↑

Where:

  • C(t) = cognition (analysis, rumination, simulation)
  • V(t) = vigilance (threat scanning, hyperarousal)
  • S(t) = somatic load (sleep issues, pain, inflammation)

In software terms: a process continues running because the stop condition never got met.

Why this shows up in tech workplaces

Veterans often performed inside environments with:

  • clear roles and accountability
  • predictable consequences
  • high signal-to-noise communication

Civilian workplaces can introduce high ambiguity:

  • unclear expectations
  • shifting priorities
  • indirect conflict
  • tone-based social signaling
  • performance feedback that feels inconsistent

For a nervous system trained under threat, ambiguity can function like risk.

This can look like:

  • over-preparing and over-checking
  • avoiding meetings/demos (visibility feels high-risk)
  • reading tone changes as danger
  • “can’t shut off thinking” after hours
  • productivity spikes followed by crash

Burnout vs PTSD (not the same)

Burnout is usually chronic overload + poor recovery.
PTSD is persistent threat processing with trauma-linked triggers and autonomic reactivity.

But at the system level they can resemble each other: both can run high background load and reduce executive function.

What helps (clinically)

PTSD doesn’t respond well to “push through it.” The relevant target is the implicit system layer.

Evidence-supported approaches include:

  • EMDR (memory reconsolidation / reducing present-threat tagging)
  • somatic regulation approaches (autonomic downshift + defensive response completion)
  • clinical hypnosis (when appropriate) to modify conditioned cue-response loops

In simple engineering terms:

  • EMDR changes the memory state
  • regulation changes the system state
  • conditioning work changes the trigger-response mapping

If you’re a veteran in tech and this pattern sounds familiar: it doesn’t mean you’re weak. It means your system is doing what it learned to do. The goal is to reduce background threat load so attention, sleep, and performance stop getting taxed by constant processing.

Top comments (0)