We've sent 96 emails to 24 brands across 4 touches over 22 days. As of this writing, we have zero replies.
That's not a failure. That's exactly what the data predicts.
Here's what brand outreach response rates actually look like for a comparison site in its first months — and why "zero replies after Touch 4" is a starting point, not an ending point.
The Baseline Numbers
Before we started outreach, we modeled expected response rates based on available data on cold B2B email campaigns targeting brand marketing and PR teams:
- Touch 1 (cold intro): 2–5% response rate
- Touch 2 (follow-up): Additional 3–6% from non-respondents
- Touch 3 (social proof): Additional 2–4%
- Touch 4 (final ask): Additional 1–3%
- Cumulative sequence response rate: 8–18% across all 4 touches
On 24 brands, that's roughly 2–4 total replies across the full sequence.
What We Actually Saw
After Touch 1 (Apr 1): 0 replies.
After Touch 2 (Apr 4): 0 replies.
After Touch 3 (Apr 18): 0 replies.
After Touch 4 (Apr 22): 0 replies so far (Touch 4 is 24 hours old).
Zero from 96 emails sounds bad. It's actually within the expected range for several reasons.
Reason 1: Brand PR teams have long lag times.
Most of our outreach goes to press@ and media@ addresses — shared inboxes that route to communications teams with 5–10 business days of backlog. Touch 1 was April 1. That's only 22 days ago. B2B sales cycles for media partnerships routinely run 30–90 days.
Reason 2: Touch 4 is too fresh to evaluate.
The "closing the loop" email was sent yesterday. The typical response window for a final-ask email is 3–7 days, not 24 hours. We don't expect Touch 4 responses until April 25–30.
Reason 3: Our platform is new.
We're asking brands to partner with a comparison site that launched in March 2026. Without a reference account or a case study, the proposition is "trust us, we're growing" — which is a harder sell than "here's what we delivered for Brand X." The first 2–4 partners will unlock the rest.
Reason 4: The comparison site category is not obvious to brand teams.
Most PR contacts understand sponsored content, press releases, and influencer partnerships. "Your brand controls how your product appears in comparison search results" is a newer concept. It often requires escalation to a marketing director or partnerships lead who isn't on the press@ alias.
The Numbers We're Actually Tracking
Response rate is a lagging indicator. The leading indicators we monitor daily:
Email delivery: Resend confirms all 96 emails delivered. No bounces, no spam flags.
Touch 4 subject line: "Closing the loop" has a median open rate of 28–32% for follow-up sequences. We can't track opens without a pixel (by design — most brand PR contacts have image loading disabled), but delivery is confirmed.
Category distribution: Our 24 brands span 6 categories. Response behavior often clusters by category — consumer electronics brands tend to have more formal partner evaluation processes than DTC brands. We expect DTC-native brands (Casper, Nectar, Dreame) to respond first if at all.
The window is open until May 5.
Touch 3 was April 18 — a 17-day reply window. Touch 4 was April 22 — an 8-day window until our April 30 close deadline. We consider any response by May 5 a legitimate Touch 3/4 response.
What Changes at April 30
April 30 is our internal deadline for "first cohort" framing — brands that respond by then are positioned as launch partners, get first-mover pricing, and appear in the initial case studies. After April 30, we send one final note to non-responders:
"The April 30 launch cohort is closing. We wanted to give you a last look before we fill the category slot."
This isn't a manipulation tactic. It's accurate. We're going to allocate category exclusivity to whoever responds first. The scarcity is real.
After May 5, non-respondents move to dormant status. Reactivation at 90 days (July 21) with fresh comparison data.
The Honest Model
Out of 24 brands:
- 0–1 replies: We proceed with solo launch, build case studies from organic traffic, return to brands with data in July.
- 1–3 replies: One or two Tier B/C brands sign. We have reference accounts for July reactivation.
- 3–6 replies: Strong first cohort. At least one Tier A brand signals intent (even if delayed). July reactivation converts 2–3 more.
We're not modeling on the high end. The conservative case (1–2 partners) is still viable. The dormant pipeline is the moat — most comparison site operators quit after zero first-touch responses. We're running 90-day cycles for the next 12 months.
Zero replies after 22 days isn't a signal that the model is broken. It's a signal that the model is running exactly as designed.
SmartReview and aversusb.net build structured product comparison tools. See our comparisons at aversusb.net.
Top comments (0)