Your existing OpenAI code already speaks DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, and Kimi. You just haven't pointed it at the right endpoint yet.
Here's the 10-second proof:
curl https://aibridge-api.com/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer mb-xxxxxxxx" \
-d '{
"model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Explain quicksort in one sentence"}]
}'
If that curl looks familiar, that's the point. It's byte-for-byte the OpenAI chat completions contract — same request shape, same response shape, same error codes. If you've ever built against the OpenAI API, you already know how to use AIBridge.
The problem: four vendors, four SDKs, four bills
If you're building anything serious with LLMs today, you probably ended up in one of two traps:
-
The SDK zoo. One wrapper for DeepSeek, another for Qwen, another for GLM, another for Moonshot. Four
pip installs, four auth flows, four streaming quirks, four ways to do the exact same thing. - The single-vendor lock-in. You picked one model and now your cost, latency, and quality are hostage to whatever that one vendor ships next week.
Neither is a real choice. Both waste time that should go into your product.
One endpoint, a whole model matrix
AIBridge exposes a single OpenAI-compatible endpoint in front of 15 models across 4 Chinese vendors:
| Model | Vendor | Context | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
deepseek-v4-pro |
DeepSeek | 128K | Flagship reasoning, top-tier performance |
deepseek-v4-flash |
DeepSeek | 128K | Fast, lightweight responses |
deepseek-reasoner |
DeepSeek | 64K | Complex reasoning, math, logic |
deepseek-coder |
DeepSeek | 64K | Code generation & debugging |
deepseek-chat |
DeepSeek | 64K | General purpose |
qwen3-235b-a22b |
Qwen | 128K | Flagship Qwen3, best overall |
qwen-plus |
Qwen | 131K | Cost-effective general usage |
qwen-max |
Qwen | 32K | Multilingual, long context |
glm-4-plus |
GLM | 128K | Advanced reasoning, complex tasks |
glm-4-air |
GLM | 128K | Balanced performance & speed |
glm-4-flash |
GLM | 128K | Fast & lightweight, cost-effective |
kimi-k3 |
Moonshot | 1M | Flagship thinking model, always-on reasoning |
moonshot-v1-128k |
Moonshot | 128K | Long documents, deep analysis |
moonshot-v1-32k |
Moonshot | 32K | Medium context |
moonshot-v1-8k |
Moonshot | 8K | Quick conversations |
The practical upshot: switching models is a one-field change, not a refactor. A/B test DeepSeek V4 Pro against Qwen3 on the same prompt by changing "model" and nothing else. Ship with glm-4-flash for latency, fall back to deepseek-v4-pro for hard reasoning. Your code doesn't care.
The pricing doesn't need a spreadsheet
- Free tier: 500K tokens/month (weighted) — enough to actually evaluate it
- Pro: $9.90/month for 5M tokens
- Top-ups: 1M / $2.99 · 5M / $9.90 · 20M / $29.90, one-time, never expire
No per-model price matrix, no surprise multipliers. One key, one meter, one predictable bill.
What you also get for free
- Playground — test prompts against any of the 15 models in the browser
- Usage dashboard — real-time token and cost tracking with a usage bar
- Prompt library — save and reuse your best prompts
- GitHub OAuth — sign in with your existing GitHub account
- Per-token atomic quota and rate limiting — so one runaway loop can't blow your bill
The takeaway
You don't need another SDK. You don't need another integration. You need to point your existing OpenAI client at https://aibridge-api.com/v1 and pick a model.
Try it free — no credit card required.
→ aibridge-api.com · support@aibridge-api.com





Top comments (0)