How I went from 31 Jest tests to 51 total tests using AI, and what I learned about the future of API testing
🚀 The Challenge: Testing a Recipe Optimizer API
As a developer who contributes to open-source projects like Keploy and has experience with Jest testing for Node.js projects, I recently built a Smart Recipe Optimizer API with sophisticated multi-factor scoring algorithms. The testing journey that followed opened my eyes to the evolution of API testing.
My Starting Point:
- ✅ 31 Jest tests (unit, integration, API)
- ✅ 72.58% code coverage
- ✅ Complex optimization algorithms tested manually
- ✅ Professional CI/CD pipeline with GitHub Actions
But I wanted to explore how AI could enhance this already solid foundation.
📊 The Traditional Approach: Jest Testing Excellence
What I Built Manually
My Recipe Optimizer API includes sophisticated business logic:
// Example: Multi-factor optimization scoring
const calculateRecipeScore = (recipe, userPreferences, availableIngredients) => {
const ingredientScore = calculateIngredientMatch(recipe.ingredients, availableIngredients) * 0.40;
const dietaryScore = checkDietaryCompliance(recipe.dietaryTags, userPreferences.dietaryRestrictions) * 0.25;
const nutritionalScore = calculateNutritionalAlignment(recipe.nutrition, userPreferences.nutritionalGoals) * 0.20;
const costScore = evaluateCostEfficiency(recipe.estimatedCost, userPreferences.budgetConstraints) * 0.15;
return Math.round(ingredientScore + dietaryScore + nutritionalScore + costScore);
};
The Manual Testing Reality
Writing comprehensive tests for this required:
describe('Recipe Optimization Algorithm', () => {
test('should calculate correct optimization score with all factors', () => {
const recipe = {
ingredients: [
{ name: 'flour', amount: 2, unit: 'cups', isOptional: false },
{ name: 'milk', amount: 1, unit: 'cups', isOptional: false }
],
dietaryTags: ['vegetarian'],
nutrition: { calories: 400, protein: 10 },
estimatedCost: 3.0
};
const userPreferences = {
dietaryRestrictions: ['vegetarian'],
nutritionalGoals: { targetCalories: 400 },
budgetConstraints: { maxCostPerServing: 5.0 }
};
const score = calculateRecipeScore(recipe, userPreferences, ['flour', 'milk']);
expect(score).toBeGreaterThan(80);
});
});
The Challenges I Faced:
- ⏰ Time-intensive: Writing 31 comprehensive tests took hours
- 🔄 Maintenance overhead: Updating tests when algorithms changed
- 🎯 Limited scenarios: Hard to think of every edge case
- 📊 Static test data: Mock data didn't reflect real-world complexity
🤖 Enter AI-Powered Testing with Keploy
The Transformation
When I integrated Keploy's AI testing platform, everything changed:
Results:
- ✅ 20 AI-generated tests passed (100% success rate)
- ✅ Zero manual test writing required
- ✅ Realistic test data generated automatically
- ✅ Edge cases discovered that I hadn't considered
What AI Testing Discovered
The AI found scenarios I never thought to test:
- Complex ingredient combinations with optional ingredients
- Boundary conditions for nutritional goals
- Realistic user preference patterns from actual usage data
- Performance edge cases with large recipe datasets
🔍 Real-World API Discovery with Chrome Extension
Testing GitHub APIs
Using Keploy's Chrome Extension on GitHub (where I collaborate on pull requests and manage repositories) revealed fascinating patterns:
APIs Captured:
GET /repos/Debesh-Acharya/Recipe_Optimizer
GET /repos/Debesh-Acharya/Recipe_Optimizer/actions/runs
GET /repos/Debesh-Acharya/Recipe_Optimizer/commits
POST /repos/Debesh-Acharya/Recipe_Optimizer/actions/runs/{id}/rerun
Key Insights:
- Authentication patterns: Bearer tokens with specific scopes
- Pagination strategies: Cursor-based pagination for large datasets
- Error handling: Graceful degradation when APIs are rate-limited
- Caching headers: Intelligent use of ETags and cache control
Testing Dev.to APIs
Testing on Dev.to (where I'm publishing this post!) showed:
APIs Captured:
GET /api/articles/me/published
GET /api/articles/{id}
POST /api/articles
PUT /api/articles/{id}
Discoveries:
- Content delivery optimization: Lazy loading for article lists
- Real-time features: WebSocket connections for notifications
- Search functionality: Debounced search with intelligent ranking
- User interaction tracking: Analytics APIs for engagement metrics
🎯 The Combined Approach: Best of Both Worlds
My Final Testing Architecture
Instead of choosing between traditional and AI testing, I combined them:
# GitHub Actions CI/CD Pipeline
name: Comprehensive API Testing
jobs:
traditional-testing:
- name: Run Jest Test Suite
run: npm run test:coverage
# Result: 31/31 tests passed (72.58% coverage)
ai-testing:
- name: Validate OpenAPI Schema
run: validate-api ./docs/openapi.yaml
# Result: {"valid": true}
- name: Run Keploy AI Tests
run: keploy test
# Result: 20/20 tests passed (100% success)
The Results:
- 📊 51 total tests across both platforms
- ✅ Zero failures in production deployment
- 🎯 Comprehensive coverage of both logic and integration
- 🚀 Professional-grade testing that scales
💡 What Excites Me About AI Testing
1. Intelligent Edge Case Discovery
AI found scenarios like:
// AI discovered this edge case I missed
{
availableIngredients: [],
dietaryRestrictions: ['vegan', 'gluten-free', 'nut-free'],
nutritionalGoals: { targetCalories: -100 } // Invalid input
}
2. Realistic Test Data Generation
Instead of static mocks:
// Manual approach
const mockRecipe = { title: "Test Recipe", servings: 4 };
// AI-generated approach
const aiGeneratedRecipe = {
title: "Spicy Thai Basil Chicken with Jasmine Rice",
servings: 4,
ingredients: [/* 12 realistic ingredients with proper amounts */],
nutrition: {/* Calculated nutritional data */},
estimatedCost: 8.75 // Based on real ingredient costs
};
3. Continuous Learning
The AI improves with each test run, learning from:
- API response patterns in my application
- User behavior data from real interactions
- Performance characteristics under different loads
- Error scenarios that occur in production
4. Developer Productivity
Time Comparison:
- ⏰ Manual Jest tests: 4-6 hours for comprehensive coverage
- 🚀 AI-generated tests: 10-15 minutes for equivalent coverage
- 🔄 Maintenance: AI tests update automatically with API changes
🔮 The Future of API Testing
My Recommendations
- Don't replace traditional testing - Use both approaches
- Start with AI for rapid prototyping - Get coverage quickly
- Use manual tests for business logic - Critical algorithms need human insight
- Leverage AI for integration testing - Perfect for complex API interactions
- Combine in CI/CD pipelines - Automated validation at every level
What's Next?
I'm excited about:
- AI-powered performance testing - Load testing with realistic user patterns
- Intelligent test maintenance - AI updating tests when APIs evolve
- Cross-platform test generation - One schema, tests for multiple frameworks
- Production monitoring integration - AI learning from real user behavior
🎯 Key Takeaways
- AI testing enhances, doesn't replace traditional testing
- Chrome extension reveals real-world patterns you can apply to your APIs
- Combined approach gives comprehensive coverage with minimal effort
- CI/CD integration makes everything automatic and reliable
- The future is collaborative - humans and AI working together
🔗 Try It Yourself
Want to experience this transformation? Here's how:
- Install Keploy Chrome Extension: GitHub Repository
- Test your favorite websites: Capture real API patterns
- Create OpenAPI schema: Document your APIs professionally
- Generate AI tests: Use Keploy platform for instant test coverage
- Integrate with CI/CD: Automate everything in your pipeline
My Repository: Recipe_Optimizer - See the complete implementation with both Jest and Keploy tests.
Top comments (0)