I Published a Neurocognitive Framework Without Credentials — and Nobody Could Refute It

I didn’t come from academia.
No lab. No institution. No funding.
Just a constraint: build something that actually holds.

Over the last months, I developed an open neurocognitive framework focused on:

• cognitive stability under uncertainty
• alignment without coercion
• human–AI interaction without authority bias
• measurable clarity instead of narrative persuasion

I published it publicly.

No peer-review gate.
No marketing.
No credentials.

And something interesting happened:
people didn’t attack it.
They tested it.

Engineers, researchers, independent thinkers — they checked the structure, the internal logic, the constraints.
No one refuted it.
Some even reused parts of it.

This is not a manifesto.
It’s not philosophy.
It’s not “AI hype”.

It’s a framework that either collapses under scrutiny or survives it.

So far, it survives.

You can read the full material here:
https://osf.io/ub5f4

If you think credentials matter more than structure, feel free to critique it.
If structure matters more than credentials, you’ll know what to do.

No authority claimed.
No followers expected.
Only one rule: if it breaks, say where.

— Jérôme Natalis
Independent researcher