I’ve been working on a cognitive framework focused on one simple goal:
improving decision clarity by constraining how decisions are formed, not by adding more narratives.
The framework emphasizes:
- explicit constraints
- identifiable failure modes
- auditability over persuasion
- reducing narrative drift in complex systems
This is not about optimization, productivity hacks, or ideology.
It’s about cognitive hygiene: making it easier to see where reasoning breaks.
I’m sharing this primarily for critical feedback:
- where do such frameworks usually fail?
- which constraints tend to be underestimated?
- how do you keep a framework useful over time instead of performative?
Reference (open, non-commercial):
https://zenodo.org/records/18209659
Thoughtful critique welcome.
Top comments (0)