DEV Community

Cover image for Why You Should Never Trust a "Restricted" Country Label on a Payment Gateway
Lillian Dube
Lillian Dube

Posted on

Why You Should Never Trust a "Restricted" Country Label on a Payment Gateway

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

Our platform is designed to allow creators to sell digital products globally. However, in one of our target markets, these payment gateways were not available, and the platform was essentially unusable. With millions of dollars in revenue at stake, we had no choice but to find an alternative. Our primary goal was to identify a payment solution that could seamlessly integrate with our existing platform, provide a seamless checkout experience for our users, and minimize any potential impact on our revenue streams.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Initially, we experimented with using cryptocurrency-based payment gateways like BitPay and PayChest. While they did allow international transactions, we encountered several issues. For instance, the fees associated with these services were significantly higher than what we were paying with Stripe, and the user interface was clunky and not user-friendly. Moreover, some of these services required us to hold the cryptocurrency in our assets, which introduced significant security and regulatory risks. We also explored using other payment gateways that offered support for specific regions, but their payment flows were too complex and inconsistent, leading to issues with chargebacks and refunds.

The Architecture Decision

After weeks of research and experimentation, we decided to implement a crypto payment infrastructure using the Cosmos-SDK and the Interledger protocol. We chose this approach because it allowed us to create a decentralized payment system that was not dependent on any single payment gateway. With this architecture, our platform users could send cryptocurrencies directly to our platform's wallet, bypassing traditional payment gateways altogether. This not only reduced our reliance on restricted payment gateways but also provided a more transparent and secure payment experience for our users. We also implemented a tokenization layer to support traditional fiat currencies, making it easier for users to make payments in their preferred currency.

What The Numbers Said After

The results were impressive. Our revenue streams remained unaffected, and we saw a 25% increase in user engagement due to the seamless checkout experience. The fees associated with our new payment infrastructure were lower than what we were paying with Stripe, and the security risks associated with holding cryptocurrency were minimized due to our use of the Cosmos-SDK. We also saw a significant reduction in chargebacks and refunds, thanks to the transparency and consistency of our new payment flow. Our user acquisition costs decreased by 15%, and our conversion rates improved by 12%. The metrics spoke for themselves: our platform was now usable in countries where traditional payment gateways were restricted, and our users loved it.

What I Would Do Differently

Although our solution was successful, I would do a few things differently if I were to recommend it to others. First, I would invest more time in researching the specific regulatory requirements of each country before implementing our solution. While our crypto payment infrastructure worked beautifully in the country we were targeting, we encountered some issues with compliance in other regions. Second, I would consider implementing a more user-friendly interface for our users to send cryptocurrencies to our platform's wallet. Our current solution requires users to have a basic understanding of cryptocurrency wallets and addresses, which can be a barrier to adoption. Finally, I would explore integrating our crypto payment infrastructure with traditional payment gateways to provide users with more options and flexibility. By doing so, we could provide a more seamless checkout experience for our users, regardless of their location.

Top comments (0)