DEV Community

Kafka Fundamentals: kafka connect standalone

Kafka Connect Standalone: A Deep Dive for Production Systems

1. Introduction

Imagine a large e-commerce platform migrating from a monolithic database to a microservices architecture. A critical requirement is real-time inventory synchronization between services, coupled with auditing of all inventory changes for compliance. Direct database access between services is a non-starter due to coupling and scalability concerns. A robust, scalable event streaming platform is needed. Kafka is chosen, but the initial data ingestion pipeline – capturing changes from the legacy database – needs to be reliable, scalable, and independent of the core Kafka cluster’s operational load. This is where Kafka Connect Standalone becomes invaluable. It provides a dedicated, isolated environment for data ingestion, preventing potential instability in the core Kafka infrastructure while offering the flexibility to adapt to evolving source systems. This post will explore the intricacies of Kafka Connect Standalone, focusing on its architecture, operational considerations, and performance optimization for production deployments.

2. What is "kafka connect standalone" in Kafka Systems?

Kafka Connect Standalone is a distribution of the Kafka Connect framework that allows running connectors outside of a fully distributed Kafka Connect cluster. Unlike the distributed mode, which relies on Kafka for connector configuration and offset management, Standalone mode uses embedded storage (typically a local filesystem) for connector state.

Introduced in Kafka 0.9.0.0 (KIP-6), it’s primarily intended for development, testing, and simpler production use cases where the overhead of a full Connect cluster isn’t justified. Key configuration flags include bootstrap.servers (pointing to the Kafka cluster), config.storage.topic (ignored in standalone mode), and offset.storage.topic (also ignored). Behaviorally, connectors in standalone mode operate as independent processes, managed directly by the user. This contrasts with distributed mode, where Kafka Connect manages connector lifecycle and scaling. While convenient, it lacks the inherent fault tolerance and scalability of a distributed Connect cluster.

3. Real-World Use Cases

  • CDC Initial Load: Performing an initial full load of data from a database into Kafka before enabling Change Data Capture (CDC). Standalone mode allows for a controlled, isolated process without impacting ongoing CDC streams.
  • Legacy System Integration: Ingesting data from older systems with limited Kafka Connect support. Standalone mode provides a bridge without requiring complex integration with the core Kafka infrastructure.
  • Data Migration: Migrating data between Kafka topics or clusters. A standalone connector can perform the transformation and replication without affecting production traffic.
  • Testing New Connectors: Rapidly prototyping and testing new connectors in a non-production environment before deploying them to a distributed Connect cluster.
  • Low-Volume Data Sources: Ingesting data from sources with very low throughput where the overhead of a distributed Connect cluster is disproportionate.

4. Architecture & Internal Mechanics

In standalone mode, the Kafka Connect worker process directly manages connector configuration, tasks, and offsets. It bypasses Kafka’s internal Connect cluster management mechanisms. The connector reads data from the source system, transforms it (if necessary), and writes it to Kafka topics. Offset management is handled locally, typically in a file-based store.

graph LR
    A[Source System] --> B(Kafka Connect Standalone Worker);
    B --> C{Kafka Broker};
    C --> D[Kafka Topic];
    style A fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style B fill:#ccf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style C fill:#fcf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style D fill:#ffc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The Kafka broker itself remains unchanged. The standalone worker interacts with the broker as a standard Kafka producer. Schema Registry integration is still possible and recommended for schema evolution and data contract enforcement. ZooKeeper is not required in standalone mode, simplifying deployment. KRaft mode is irrelevant as standalone Connect doesn't participate in the Kafka cluster's metadata management.

5. Configuration & Deployment Details

server.properties (Kafka Broker): Standard Kafka broker configuration. Ensure sufficient resources (memory, disk) are allocated.

connect-standalone.properties (Kafka Connect Standalone Worker):

bootstrap.servers=kafka-broker1:9092,kafka-broker2:9092
group.id=my-standalone-connect
offset.storage.file.directory=/tmp/connect-offsets
task.class=io.confluent.connect.jdbc.JdbcSourceTask
connector.class=io.confluent.connect.jdbc.JdbcSourceConnector
name=my-jdbc-source
connection.url=jdbc:mysql://mysql-server:3306/mydb
connection.user=user
connection.password=password
table=my_table
mode=timestamp
timestamp.column=updated_at
topic=my_topic
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

CLI Examples:

  • Start the standalone worker: kafka-connect-standalone.sh connect-standalone.properties
  • List running connectors: kafka-connect-standalone.sh config/connect-standalone.properties list
  • View connector configuration: kafka-connect-standalone.sh config/connect-standalone.properties view my-jdbc-source

6. Failure Modes & Recovery

Standalone mode lacks the inherent fault tolerance of a distributed Connect cluster. If the worker process fails, the connector stops, and data ingestion halts. Offset loss is a significant risk if not handled carefully.

  • Worker Failure: Restart the worker process. Offsets stored in the offset.storage.file.directory will be re-read, allowing the connector to resume from the last committed offset.
  • Message Loss: Implement idempotent producers on the source system if possible. Alternatively, configure a Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) topic to capture failed messages for later reprocessing.
  • ISR Shrinkage: This is a Kafka broker issue, not directly related to standalone Connect. Ensure sufficient replication factor and healthy brokers.

Recovery strategies rely heavily on robust offset management and potentially, message deduplication.

7. Performance Tuning

Standalone mode performance is limited by the resources allocated to the worker process.

  • batch.size: Increase the number of records processed per batch to improve throughput.
  • linger.ms: Increase the delay before sending a batch to Kafka to allow for larger batches.
  • compression.type: Use compression (e.g., gzip, snappy) to reduce network bandwidth.
  • Source System Tuning: Optimize the source system for efficient data extraction.

Benchmark results will vary depending on the source system and connector. Expect throughput in the range of 10-100 MB/s on a moderately sized machine. Standalone mode generally introduces higher latency than a distributed Connect cluster due to the lack of parallel processing.

8. Observability & Monitoring

Monitor the standalone worker process using standard system monitoring tools (CPU, memory, disk I/O). Kafka JMX metrics can be exposed via the -J- flag when starting the worker: kafka-connect-standalone.sh -J-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -J-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=9999 connect-standalone.properties.

Critical metrics:

  • Connector Status: Ensure the connector is running and healthy.
  • Offset Lag: Monitor the difference between the latest offset in the source system and the committed offset in Kafka.
  • Task Status: Verify that all tasks are running without errors.
  • CPU/Memory Usage: Identify resource bottlenecks.

Use Prometheus and Grafana to visualize these metrics and set up alerts.

9. Security and Access Control

Secure the Kafka cluster using standard Kafka security mechanisms (SASL, SSL, ACLs). Ensure the standalone worker has the necessary permissions to read from the source system and write to Kafka topics. Consider encrypting sensitive data in transit and at rest.

10. Testing & CI/CD Integration

Use testcontainers to spin up a temporary Kafka cluster and source system for integration testing. Mock the source system to simulate different scenarios (e.g., data errors, network outages). Include schema compatibility checks in the CI/CD pipeline to prevent breaking changes. Automate connector deployment and configuration using infrastructure-as-code tools.

11. Common Pitfalls & Misconceptions

  • Offset Loss: Failing to configure offset.storage.file.directory correctly can lead to offset loss on worker restarts.
  • Resource Constraints: Insufficient memory or CPU can cause performance degradation or worker crashes.
  • Schema Evolution Issues: Lack of Schema Registry integration can lead to data compatibility problems.
  • Configuration Errors: Incorrect connector configuration can result in data ingestion failures.
  • Ignoring Logs: Failing to monitor the worker logs can mask underlying issues. Example log message indicating offset commit failure: org.apache.kafka.connect.storage.OffsetStorageWriter - Failed to commit offsets: {my-jdbc-source-0=12345}

12. Enterprise Patterns & Best Practices

  • Dedicated Topics: Use dedicated topics for each connector to isolate data streams.
  • Schema Evolution: Always use Schema Registry to manage schema changes.
  • Retention Policies: Configure appropriate retention policies for Kafka topics.
  • Monitoring & Alerting: Implement comprehensive monitoring and alerting to detect and resolve issues quickly.
  • Transition to Distributed Mode: As data volumes and complexity increase, consider migrating to a distributed Connect cluster.

13. Conclusion

Kafka Connect Standalone provides a valuable tool for simplifying data ingestion and integration in specific scenarios. While it lacks the scalability and fault tolerance of a distributed Connect cluster, its simplicity and ease of deployment make it ideal for development, testing, and low-volume data sources. By understanding its limitations and implementing robust monitoring and recovery strategies, you can leverage Kafka Connect Standalone to build reliable and efficient real-time data pipelines. Next steps should include implementing comprehensive observability, building internal tooling for connector management, and proactively evaluating the need to transition to a distributed Connect cluster as data volumes grow.

Top comments (0)