DEV Community

Cover image for Before You Build a Polymarket Trading Bot, Build This Instead
Dexoryn
Dexoryn

Posted on

Before You Build a Polymarket Trading Bot, Build This Instead

A small research tool can teach you more about a prediction market than a hundred lines of automated orders.

There is a very tempting project sitting in front of anyone who knows a little Python:

Build a Polymarket bot.

Pull the markets.

Find a signal.

Place an order.

Watch it trade.

It sounds like a fun weekend project.

But there is a problem.

A trading bot can execute your assumptions perfectly while your assumptions are completely wrong.

So before building something that trades, build something that looks.

A small market scanner.

Not a bot that tells you what to buy.

A tool that makes it easier to see what is actually happening.

Start with the markets

Polymarket's Gamma API gives developers access to market and event data, including questions, outcomes, liquidity, volume, status, and the token IDs used by the CLOB. Public market-data reads do not require authentication.

That makes it a good place to start.

Here is a deliberately simple example:

import requests

url = "https://gamma-api.polymarket.com/markets"

params = {
"active": "true",
"closed": "false",
"limit": 20
}

response = requests.get(url, params=params)
response.raise_for_status()

markets = response.json()

for market in markets:
print(market["question"])

That's not impressive.

And that's exactly the point.

You don't need an impressive first version.

You need to see the data.

Once you understand what the API is actually returning, you can decide what deserves to be built on top of it.

Then make the output useful

A list of market names isn't particularly helpful.

I'd rather see something like this:

YES 0.64
Liquidity $42,381
Volume $318,902

Will Bitcoin reach $150,000 before...

That immediately gives you something to investigate.

You can create a basic market screener:

for market in markets:
question = market.get("question", "Unknown")
liquidity = float(market.get("liquidity") or 0)
volume = float(market.get("volume") or 0)

print(f"\n{question}")
print(f"Liquidity: ${liquidity:,.0f}")
print(f"Volume:    ${volume:,.0f}")
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now you're no longer browsing blindly.

You're starting to build a dataset.

And that's where things become interesting.

The token ID is the bridge

One detail is easy to miss when you first work with Polymarket's APIs.

The market you see as a human isn't necessarily the identifier you use when requesting CLOB data.

Gamma gives you the market information and the CLOB token IDs.

Those token IDs are what you carry into the CLOB when you want information such as prices and order books.

For a binary market, you can extract them like this:

import json

market = markets[0]

token_ids = market.get("clobTokenIds")

if isinstance(token_ids, str):
token_ids = json.loads(token_ids)

yes_token = token_ids[0]
no_token = token_ids[1]

print("YES:", yes_token)
print("NO:", no_token)

Now the market has a connection to the order book.

That is where the interesting part begins.

Don't just ask for the price

A price is easy to display.

An order book tells you much more.

The CLOB provides a public order-book endpoint for a token.

url = "https://clob.polymarket.com/book"

response = requests.get(
url,
params={"token_id": yes_token}
)

response.raise_for_status()

book = response.json()

print(book)

At this point, your program can start asking questions that a simple market list cannot answer.

How large is the spread?

How much is available near the current price?

Is the book deep or thin?

Has the structure changed?

What happens if someone wants to buy a much larger position?

Those are much more interesting questions than:

Is YES at 64%?

Build a tiny market report

You don't need machine learning.

You don't need an LLM.

You don't need a complicated trading strategy.

You can start with a small report.

bids = book.get("bids", [])
asks = book.get("asks", [])

best_bid = max(
float(order["price"])
for order in bids
) if bids else None

best_ask = min(
float(order["price"])
for order in asks
) if asks else None

print("Best bid:", best_bid)
print("Best ask:", best_ask)

if best_bid is not None and best_ask is not None:
print("Spread:", round(best_ask - best_bid, 4))

Now your scanner knows more than the headline price.

It knows what buyers are offering.

It knows what sellers are asking.

And it can calculate the gap between them.

That is already enough to start finding interesting markets.

Then add history

This is where a simple script turns into an actual research project.

A current snapshot tells you what the market looks like now.

Historical data lets you ask what happened before.

Polymarket's CLOB exposes historical price data, so you can collect observations over time instead of looking at one moment in isolation.

You could start asking:

Did the price move gradually or suddenly?

How did the market react to major news?

How often does liquidity disappear during large moves?

Do some types of markets behave differently?

How quickly does a market reprice after new information?

Those questions can eventually become a proper research dataset.

And that is much more interesting than simply writing:

if price < 0.40:
buy()

This is where most bot projects go wrong

The code is rarely the hardest part.

The difficult part is deciding what the code should believe.

A rule like:

if price < 0.40:
buy()

isn't a strategy.

It's an instruction.

Why 40%?

Why this market?

Why now?

What information does the market price already contain?

What happens when liquidity is poor?

What happens when the price moves against you?

What makes the signal stop working?

Until those questions have good answers, automating the trade just makes the uncertainty faster.

Build the research layer first

A useful first version could be surprisingly small.

It could:

  1. Find active markets.
  2. Filter them by liquidity or volume.
  3. Show current prices.
  4. Pull the order book.
  5. Calculate the spread.
  6. Save historical observations.
  7. Flag markets that meet your research conditions.

Then you can open the interesting ones yourself.

After that, you have a much better foundation for experimenting with models, alerts, dashboards, or eventually automated execution.

The important thing is that the trading system comes last.

The data pipeline comes first.

There is something satisfying about this approach

You start with a question.

Then you turn it into data.

Then you make the data readable.

Then you notice patterns.

Then you test whether those patterns actually mean anything.

Only after all of that do you ask whether a trading strategy makes sense.

That's a much healthier development cycle.

And it applies far beyond Polymarket.

Any time you're tempted to automate a financial decision, there is value in building the tool that helps you understand the decision first.

Because sometimes the best thing your first trading bot can do...

is not trade.

It can just show you what you were about to trade.

Top comments (0)