Nowadays the Mobile App is ruling the World! From ordering to delivery, workout to weight loss, analyzing to deploying many things can be done through Apps. This article will let you know about the Ideology of Apps. The contrast between Native and Hybrid is not big. Let’s see the contrasts here. Are you in a dilemma about choosing Hybrid or Native technology for your business mobile application? Cheers! This article will be helpful for you to decide.
Both technologies are good in their own way. Hybrid is smart. Native is hierarchical. So, before you decide which one is best, let’s see which is comfortable and user interested. Mobile phones are very close to us nowadays. Our phones know what we are going to do next. Imagine this scenario, you lost your mobile in some public place and you just didn’t worry about that loss and moved on happily. Definitely, you can’t!
Yes! Mobile is a big part of our world. So let’s decide by some discussion of verses between Hybrid and Native Mobile Apps. Before we surf into the context, let’s see what is Hybrid Mobile App Development and Native App Development.
WHAT IS HYBRID MOBILE APP DEVELOPMENT?
Hybrid App Development is like Native Apps but works across all platforms. Hybrid is the combination of both Native and Web Apps. The Apps are built using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The Backend part of the Hybrid App possesses coding sections like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The Frontend of the Hybrid app possesses a Native shell, which could be downloaded and acts as a web view.
WHAT IS NATIVE MOBILE APP DEVELOPMENT?
The Native Mobile App Development works across certain declared or pre-defined platforms like iOS and Android. To build a Native App, a specific Integrated Development Environment will be there like Swift and Objective-C for iOS and Java or Kotlin for Android OS. Native Mobile App Development possesses its own elements, developments, and SDK. Most of the companies will invest in Native Apps.
ADVANTAGES OF HYBRID MOBILE APP DEVELOPMENT
- Hybrid apps never need a browser like Web-apps. Hybrid Apps can install through the corresponding VIP.
- Anyone / Only one code is enough for Hybrid App. It’s not mandatory to maintain more languages.
- Hybrid can access both the device’s internal API’s and hardware.
- The User can differentiate the website and its application. - The UI is consistent for users to get attracted. The availability of the app in app store / API links makes the user maintain consistency with the app. The app will have updates according to its OS platforms.
- Hybrid apps work speed. The user won’t use the app if it is not responding soon to user requests.
- Cost efficiency is high. Most of the apps also run offline also through API to save information.
- The user can also feel like the Native App with a simple backend, not as complex codes in Native Apps.
- Large Innovation ideas to reach more targeted audiences and good UI designs.
- Very good speed performance without hanging or delay while requesting a service.
- Good UX/UI designs as Native Apps, which attracts and keeps maintaining user usage.
- Because of Platform independence, many users can install and use it.
- Developing time is short compared with Native Mobile App.
- Because of a single code language, the hybrid apps can be easy to maintain and for further development.
DISADVANTAGES OF HYBRID MOBILE APP DEVELOPMENT
- Hybrid Apps have limited functionality. Sometimes the developer can get access to connect through certain hardware or software for the particular app. This limits the app’s functionality.
- Most of the time, the app requires the support of the web browser to make further operations like bookmarking, storing.
- Less discoverability, because the user cannot download it through any app store.
- In most of the apps, the user account is not mandatory unless the user is interested to create a specified account for themselves.
- Lack of Debugging in Hybrid Apps, The App doesn’t have strong code support to run and test. Some Hybrid Apps have some hidden apps.
- The testing team faces some issues because of some errors and rectifies them, then runs properly.
- Not all Native features are available in Hybrid Apps because of the single code function.
- Sometimes it needs an internet connection for sure while using a supporting web browser for it.
- Lack of some limited functions, the UI/UX design may not be liked by the user. It makes the user switch their mind to some other apps, which leads to the loss of users.
- The Glitches in Hybrid Apps make the app slow, which may irritate the user for the delay responding, and the user may stop using the app which leads to the installation of other apps.
ADVANTAGES OF NATIVE MOBILE APP DEVELOPMENT
- Best performance because the IDE has its own elements and language to run, test, and debug.
- Provide more security for the users who can trust and install it for the free or paid version.
- Native Apps are more attracted by the user with the help of good UI/UX designers and developers who are well trained by the company.
- In Native Apps, the developers have the freedom to work and get access to the entire set of services.
- Native apps mostly possess a minimum number of bugs/errors the developer team can definitely solve the spotted errors.
- The key priority is to attract and user maintenance by providing the best services with the help of developers who are professionally well trained.
- As the Native Apps have more users, the maintenance is mandatory and successfully maintained by the maintenance team of the Mobile App Development Company.
- The Uniform Designs and Development makes the user consistent, which didn’t confuse them from one operation/task to another.
- The Native apps will satisfy all the checklists to be a good and compatible app for the user.
- Offline Performance is far better, and excellent while compared with Hybrid Apps.
- The uniform stability does not deviate from the beginning design to the end.
- Native apps will provide both paid and unpaid users. The difference between paid and unpaid is advertisements and specified user accounts.
- Provide better hardware integration with the device and access to the limited files of the device.
DISADVANTAGES OF NATIVE MOBILE APP DEVELOPMENT
- The cost is a bit high if it's a paid version to provide more security from the nook and corner.
- Maintenance is a bit difficult because of the many users.
- The App store protocols may throw some issues for the developer to design or develop the desired feature.
- To update and maintain all kinds of platforms is more difficult for a developer.
- Time is more tedious to develop the Native app, which makes it complex for developers.
- Sometimes the developer needs help from the specialist which is also time and cost consuming.
- The long development process makes the team or developer.
Is the new App technical architectural pattern taken into account: "Native+Miniapp"?
Essentially, the miniapp is a virtual machine that handles Web page rendering and data logic interaction during the runtime. It provides rich native capabilities for miniapps to invoke (API, components, AI capabilities, etc.), greatly expanding the boundaries of Web application capabilities. Especially, the availability of components such as scrool-view, navigator and cover-image enables front-end developers to develop applications that are close to native experiences by using existing web front-end technologies.
Technical advantages:
- Cross-platform capability, with one set of code running in both iOS and Android platforms;
- Far superior experience than H5 (local caching support, Webview, rich components and support libraries);
- The ability to obtain more system permissions and accomplish richer product designs;
- The ability to avoid DOM leaks (no common window objects and document objects are used);
- The package size is effectively reduced to save traffic and storage;
- The service is no longer restricted by the release, and supports hot updates. There are also universal solutions for miniapps available on the market, and today's topic is FinClip, a very popular project on Github. Its biggest characteristic is the ability to let any App run miniapps.
You only need to introduce its SDK inside your App, and then you can load and run external miniapps. In addition to the SDK, it also provides a backend management system to unify the management of miniapps’ release, as well as collect and analyze the data of miniapps.
What’s more, FinClip also supports multiple terminals other than cell phones, including Linux, Windows, MacOS, HarmonyOS and other operating systems, which means that you can use miniapps on PC, car devices and smart TVs. So, it has realized " once development for running everywhere" of miniapps.
If you also want to run miniapps on your App, FinClip is worth sonsidering. We suggest you visit the official tutorial and product manual for more details.
Top comments (0)
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.