EEL Update: Simple Mining, 0x Wallet Flow and Public Explorer Testing
In my first post about EEL, I explained why I chose to build a native Proof-of-Work chain instead of launching another ERC-20 token.
This update is more practical.
I want to share what I am currently improving around mining, wallet onboarding, transfers, and public explorer verification.
Website and explorer:
https://eel.best
What is EEL?
EEL is a small independent native Proof-of-Work chain.
It is not an ERC-20 token, not a presale, and not a smart contract launch.
EEL has its own:
- blocks
- transactions
- balances
- mining
- public explorer
- 0x-style addresses
The goal is to keep the project simple enough that a user can understand the basic flow:
- Create or open a 0x wallet
- Add the EEL network
- Start mining
- Send or receive EEL
- Check the result in the explorer
That is the core experience I am trying to improve.
Why focus on mining UX?
Mining can be intimidating for new users.
Many people hear “mining” and immediately think about large ASIC farms, complicated configuration files, pool settings, expensive electricity, or Linux-only setups.
EEL is much smaller and experimental, so I want the first interaction to feel simpler.
The website currently points users toward simple mining options:
- browser mining
- Windows miner
- Linux miner
The purpose is not to promise profit.
The purpose is to make it easy for curious users to test a native Proof-of-Work chain and see how mining, blocks, rewards, balances, and explorer data connect together.
Browser mining as an onboarding tool
Browser mining has a bad reputation because of hidden miners and abusive websites.
I understand that concern.
For EEL, browser mining is not meant to be hidden or forced. It should be visible, voluntary, and easy to stop.
Used honestly, browser mining can be useful for education and onboarding.
It lets a user try the idea without installing a full mining setup first.
A good browser mining flow should make these things clear:
- what wallet address is being used
- whether mining is active
- how mining progress is shown
- how to stop mining
- where to verify activity
- where to check balances and transactions
That is the kind of UX I want to keep improving.
Why 0x-style wallet flow?
EEL uses 0x-style addresses because the format is familiar to many crypto users.
People who have used MetaMask, SafePal, Rabby, Trust Wallet, Polygon, BNB Chain, Base, Arbitrum, or Ethereum already recognize the address format.
But EEL is not an ERC-20 token.
The idea is:
- familiar address style
- native PoW chain behavior
- own balances
- own transactions
- own blocks
- public explorer verification
This gives users a more familiar starting point without turning EEL into a token contract.
Public explorer testing
The explorer is one of the most important parts of EEL.
If users cannot inspect the chain, the project becomes harder to trust.
The explorer should make it easy to check:
- latest blocks
- transactions
- addresses
- balances
- network activity
- mining activity
- transfer history
Recently, I have been testing transfer behavior using normal on-chain transactions.
This helps check whether:
- balances update correctly
- fees display correctly
- transactions appear clearly
- address pages make sense
- explorer history is readable
- users can verify what happened
Some recent transaction activity may simply be part of normal testing.
That is important to explain publicly because I want the chain activity to be transparent, not confusing.
What I am improving now
The current development focus is practical:
- making mining access easier to understand
- improving explorer readability
- checking transaction and balance display
- testing normal transfers
- improving wallet/network flow
- making documentation clearer
- preparing better visual instructions for new users
I am also trying to explain the project in a way that normal users can understand.
A small chain does not need complicated language to look serious.
It needs clear information, working tools, and public data.
What kind of feedback helps?
At this stage, useful feedback is more valuable than hype.
I am interested in questions like:
- Is the website clear enough?
- Is the mining flow understandable?
- Is the explorer easy to read?
- Are address and transaction pages useful?
- What would make the project feel more trustworthy?
- Would you try browser mining first, or download a Windows/Linux miner?
- What information should be added for new users?
These are the kinds of questions that actually help improve a small project.
What EEL is not trying to be
EEL is not trying to be a presale story or a marketing-first launch.
It is not:
- an ERC-20 token
- an ICO
- a presale
- an NFT project
- a DeFi farming layer
- a paid influencer campaign
- a price promise
There are no guaranteed outcomes here.
The project is still early, small, and experimental.
But it is being built with a simple direction:
Make mining accessible, keep explorer data public, use familiar 0x-style addresses, and grow through real testing instead of artificial hype.
Final thought
For me, the interesting part of EEL is not only the chain itself.
It is the process of making a small Proof-of-Work project understandable.
A user should be able to mine, send, receive, and verify without needing to trust a marketing page.
That is the standard I am trying to move toward.
Website and explorer:
https://eel.best
Feedback, testing, mining reports, and technical suggestions are welcome.
Top comments (0)