Choosing a state management library for your React app can be tricky. Some of your options include:
- Using React’s
useReducerhook in combination with React Context - Going for a longstanding and popular library like Redux or MobX
- Trying something new like react-sweet-state or Recoil (if you're feeling adventurous!)
To help you make a more informed decision, this series aims to give a quick overview of creating a to-do list app using a variety of state management solutions.
In this post we will be using a combination of the useReducer hook and React Context to build our example app, as well as a quick detour to take a look at a library called React Tracked.
If you want to follow along, I have created a repository for the example app created in this guide at react-state-comparison.
This post assumes knowledge of how to render functional components in React, as well as a general understanding of how hooks work.
App functionality and structure
The functionality we will be implementing in this app will include the following:
- Editing the name of the to-do list
- Creating, deleting and editing a task
The structure of the app will look something like this:
src
common
components # component code we can re-use in future posts
react # the example app we are creating in today's post
state # where we initialise and manage our state
components # state-aware components that make use of our common components
Creating our common components
First we'll be creating some components in our common folder. These "view" components won’t have any knowledge of what state management library we are using. Their sole purpose will be to render a component, and to use callbacks that we pass in as props. We’re putting them in a common folder so that we can re-use them in future posts in this series.
We’ll need four components:
-
NameView- a field to let us edit the to-do list’s name -
CreateTaskView- a field with a “create” button so we can create a new task -
TaskView- a checkbox, name of the task, and a “delete” button for the task -
TasksView- loops through and renders all the tasks
As an example, the code for the Name component will look like this:
// src/common/components/name
import React from 'react';
const NameView = ({ name, onSetName }) => (
<input
type="text"
defaultValue={name}
onChange={(event) => onSetName(event.target.value)}
/>
);
export default NameView;
Each time we edit the name, we’ll be calling the onSetName callback with the current value of the input (accessed through the event object).
In a real-life app, you might think about holding off on making this call until the user has saved the task’s name. You could either have a "save" button for this, or listen for the user to leaving the input field by clicking away or pressing enter.
The code for the other three components follow a similar sort of pattern, which you can check out in the common/components folder.
Defining the shape of our store
Next we should think about how our store should look. With local state, your state lives inside of individual React components. In contrast to this, a store is a central place where you can put all the state for your app.
We’ll be storing the name of our to-do list, as well as a tasks map that contains all our tasks mapped against their IDs:
const store = {
listName: 'To-do list name',
tasks: {
'1': {
name: 'Task name',
checked: false,
id: 1,
}
}
}
Creating our reducer and actions
A reducer and actions is what we use to modify the data in our store.
An action's job is to ask for the store to be modified. It will say:
“Hey, I want to change the to-do list’s name to be 'Fancy new name'”.
The reducer's job is to modify the store. The reducer will receive that request, and go:
"Okay, I will change the to-do list's name to be 'Fancy new name'"
Actions
Each action will have two values:
- An action's
type- to update the list’s name you could define the type asupdateListName - An action’s
payload- to update the list's name, the payload would contain "Fancy new name"
Dispatching our updateListName action would look something like this:
dispatch({
type: 'updateListName',
payload: { name: 'Fancy new name' }
});
Reducers
A reducer is where we define how we will modify the state using the action’s payload. It’s a function that takes in the current state of the store as its first argument, and the action as its second:
// src/react/state/reducers
export const reducer = (state, action) => {
const { listName, tasks } = state;
switch (action.type) {
case 'updateListName': {
const { name } = action.payload;
return { listName: name, tasks };
}
default: {
return state;
}
}
};
With a switch statement, the reducer will attempt to find a matching case for the action. If the action isn’t defined in the reducer, we would enter the default case and return the state object unchanged.
If it is defined, we will go ahead and return a modified version of the state object. In our case, we would change the listName value.
A super-important thing to note here is that we never directly modify the state object that we receive. e.g. Don’t do this:
state.listName = 'New list name';
We need our app to re-render when values in our store are changed, but if we directly modify the state object this won’t happen. We need to make sure that we return new objects. If you don’t want to do this manually, there are libraries like immer that will do this safely for you.
Creating and initialising our store
Now that we’ve defined our reducer and actions, we need to create our store using React Context and useReducer:
// src/react/state/store
import React, { createContext, useReducer } from 'react';
import { reducer } from '../reducers';
import { initialState } from '../../../common/mocks';
export const TasksContext = createContext();
export const TasksProvider = ({ children }) => {
const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(reducer, initialState);
return (
<TasksContext.Provider value={{ state, dispatch }}>
{children}
</TasksContext.Provider>
);
};
The useReducer hook allows us to create a reducer using the reducer function we defined earlier. We also pass in an initial state object, which might look something like this:
const initialState = {
listName: 'My new list',
tasks: {},
};
When we wrap the Provider around our app, any component will be able to access the state object to render what it needs, as well as the dispatch function to dispatch actions as the user interacts with the UI.
Wrapping our app with the Provider
We need to create our React app in our src/react/components folder, and wrap it in our new provider:
// src/react/components
import React from 'react';
import { TasksProvider } from '../state/store';
import Name from './name';
import Tasks from './tasks';
import CreateTask from './create-task';
const ReactApp = () => (
<>
<h2>React with useReducer + Context</h2>
<TasksProvider>
<Name />
<Tasks />
<CreateTask />
</TasksProvider>
</>
);
export default ReactApp;
You can see all the state-aware components we are using here and I'll be covering the Name component below.
Accessing data and dispatching actions
Using our NameView component that we created earlier, we'll be re-using it to create our Name component. It can access values from Context using the useContext hook:
import React, { useContext } from 'react';
import NameView from '../../../common/components/name';
import { TasksContext } from '../../state/store';
const Name = () => {
const {
dispatch,
state: { listName }
} = useContext(TasksContext);
const onSetName = (name) =>
dispatch({ type: 'updateListName', payload: { name } });
return <NameView name={name} onSetName={onSetName} />;
};
export default Name;
We can use the state value to render our list’s name, and the dispatch function to dispatch an action when the name is edited. And then our reducer will update the store. And it’s as simple as that!
The problem with React Context
Unfortunately, with this simplicity comes a catch. Using React Context will cause re-renders for any components that are using the useContext hook. In our example, we'll have a useContext hook in both the Name and Tasks components. If we modify the list’s name, it causes the Tasks component to re-render, and vice versa.
This won’t pose any performance issues for our small to-do list app, but lots of re-renders isn’t very good for performance as your app gets bigger. If you want the ease of use of React Context and useReducer without the re-render issues, there is a workaround library that you can use instead.
Replacing React Context with React Tracked
React Tracked is a super small (1.6kB) library that acts as a wrapper on top of React Context.
Your reducer and actions file can stay the same, but you’ll need to replace your store file with this:
//src/react-tracked/state/store
import React, { useReducer } from 'react';
import { createContainer } from 'react-tracked';
import { reducer } from '../reducers';
const useValue = ({ reducer, initialState }) =>
useReducer(reducer, initialState);
const { Provider, useTracked, useTrackedState, useUpdate } = createContainer(
useValue
);
export const TasksProvider = ({ children, initialState }) => (
<Provider reducer={reducer} initialState={initialState}>
{children}
</Provider>
);
export { useTracked, useTrackedState, useUpdate };
There are three hooks you can use to access your state and dispatch values:
const [state, dispatch] = useTracked();
const dispatch = useUpdate();
const state = useTrackedState();
And that’s the only difference! Now if you edit the name of your list, it won’t cause the tasks to re-render.
Conclusion
Using useReducer in conjunction with React Context is a great way to quickly get started with managing your state. However re-rendering can become a problem when using Context. If you’re looking for a quick fix, React Tracked is a neat little library that you can use instead.
To check out any of the code that we’ve covered today, you can head to react-state-comparison to see the full examples. You can also take a sneak peek at the Redux example app we’ll be going through next week! If you have any questions, or a suggestion for a state management library that I should look into, please let me know.
Thanks for reading!
Top comments (11)
Great, thank you that is exactly what I need to improve my work
Glad to hear, let me know if you have any questions 🙂
No problem, I will :)
Bookmarking for my next React project. react-tracked looks great!
I actually hadn't heard of it until I was Googling for workarounds to Context's re-render problem! I'm curious if many people use it in their apps or if people jump straight to something like Redux 🤔
Same thoughts.
I'm checking out easy-peasy for now as it is more friendly at least for me. 😀
Wow, I wonder how many state management libraries are out there because I hadn't heard of that one either! I might check that one out too 😄
Nice article!
Just a question though, because in most tutorials I see using context, the app is so small that the direct children of the entire app use context. I was wondering, in a larger app, should the Provider always be at the top in app.js, or only in the parent of the children that require the state?
Good question! The context doesn't need to be at the top of the app, you can put it anywhere where it's needed.
Nicely written! 💯
Thank you!