DEV Community

Mochammad Farros Fatchur Roji
Mochammad Farros Fatchur Roji

Posted on • Originally published at farrosfr.com on

Exploring Medusa JS for Scalable B2B Commerce

Why I’m Looking Beyond Traditional Platforms

When building a B2B e-commerce platform , the challenges are usually not about themes or plugins, but about architecture :

  • Custom pricing logic2
  • Flexible product structures
  • Integration with internal systems
  • Scalability without vendor lock-in

Popular platforms like Magento are mature and powerful, but also come with complexity and operational overhead. For newer projects where flexibility and long-term maintainability matter, I started exploring Medusa JS.


What Is Medusa JS?

Medusa JS is an open-source, headless commerce backend. Conceptually, it sits in a similar space to Shopify—but instead of a hosted SaaS, Medusa is self-hosted and API-first.

In practice, this means:

  • You own the backend
  • You control the data
  • You design the frontend freely

This makes it particularly interesting for custom B2B workflows.


Architecture Overview

alt text

At a high level, the setup looks like this:

  • Backend : Medusa JS (Node.js)
  • Database : PostgreSQL
  • Frontend : Next.js (or any framework consuming APIs)
  • Optional : Redis for caching and background jobs

The backend exposes clean APIs, while business logic is organized into services, entities, subscribers, and plugins. From an architectural standpoint, this separation is a big plus for long-term maintenance.


Early Observations (Pros & Cons)

alt text

What Looks Promising

  • JavaScript-first stack : Easier onboarding for modern web teams
  • API-driven design : Clean separation between frontend and backend
  • Modular extensibility : Plugins and custom services feel natural
  • PostgreSQL as a core dependency : Solid choice for transactional systems

Things to Be Careful About

  • The ecosystem is still young compared to Magento
  • Documentation is good, but real-world examples are limited
  • Requires more architectural decisions upfront
  • Not ideal for teams looking for a “click-and-deploy” solution

Current Status: Testing & Validation

Right now, I’m still in the early-stage testing phase , running Medusa on a VPS and validating:

  • Deployment stability
  • Data modeling for B2B use cases
  • Integration patterns with a custom frontend
  • Operational complexity in real environments

This is not about replacing mature platforms blindly, but about understanding where Medusa fits best.


Final Thoughts

Medusa JS is not a silver bullet , but for teams that:

  • need full control,
  • value open-source,
  • and are comfortable designing their own architecture,

…it’s a very compelling option.

I’ll be sharing more findings once the testing phase progresses.


Resources

Top comments (0)