Why decentralization isn't enough to save the next generation of social platforms
The Web3 dream is a noble one: own your identity, control your content, escape the claws of Big Tech. Projects like Lens Protocol, Farcaster, Nostr, and others are all building decentralized social networks with these ideals at heart.
But here's the problem: ideals don't scale. Behavior does.
People Want Attention, Not Ownership
Most people don’t wake up thinking, "I wish I had full sovereign control of my tweets." They wake up and think, "How do I get more likes today?" Web3 apps are selling data ownership when the market is hungry for dopamine.
Lens and Farcaster are impressive from a technical standpoint, but the onboarding process is brutal. Wallets, invite codes, gas fees (sometimes), and niche UX decisions create a walled garden that only crypto natives can navigate. That’s not mass adoption. That’s a club.
Meanwhile, Web2 social platforms continue to dominate because they just work. They're addictive, fast, and intuitive. They reward users with engagement, recognition, and reach. Web3 platforms often reward you with... well, a protocol.
Engagement vs. Ideology
Decentralization doesn’t guarantee virality. It doesn’t deliver fun. It doesn’t magically make social media meaningful. A platform that puts governance, sovereignty, and on-chain identity before user satisfaction is building for ideology, not for humans.
We’ve seen bursts of interest in Web3 social before — especially during airdrop seasons when incentives are aligned with usage. But once the money disappears, so does the engagement. The reality? Users want visibility, not voting rights.
The UX Paradox
Crypto-native onboarding flows (wallets, seed phrases, transactions) might make sense for DeFi, but for social media? They’re UX poison. People want to sign in and start scrolling, not configure a decentralized profile tied to a token.
Also, let’s talk permanence: putting your social identity and posts on-chain forever might sound great until you realize that embarrassing meme or political take from 2022 is now a permanent part of your digital soul.
Where Web3 Social Could Actually Win
The next wave of Web3 social platforms won’t call themselves Web3. They’ll hide the complexity. They’ll offer a slick experience. The decentralization will be under the hood, not in the user journey.
And when data ownership does become mainstream, it won’t be because of idealism. It’ll be because it feels better, works smoother, and rewards more fairly. We’re not there yet.
In Conclusion
Web3 social media won’t fail because it’s wrong. It’ll fail because it’s early, it’s clunky, and it misunderstands the average user.
Until platforms can compete with the addictive efficiency of Web2, the masses will stay where their friends, followers, and attention are.
Data ownership is cool. But virality wins.
Top comments (0)
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.