Most tools built around “life guidance” optimize for one thing:
engagement.
Predictions, personalization, feedback loops, memory —
all designed to keep users coming back.
I wanted to explore the opposite direction.
So I built PredictorsGPT, a deterministic life-rhythm interpretation tool that:
- doesn’t learn from users
- doesn’t store data
- doesn’t personalize
- doesn’t tell people what to do
And that was the hard part.
The Original Design Question
The problem I wanted to solve wasn’t:
“How do we predict life outcomes better?”
It was:
“How do we help users feel oriented without creating dependency?”
Most “AI life tools” blur into one of these categories:
- pseudo-therapy
- astrology rebranded as ML
- engagement-driven coaching
All three rely on adaptive systems.
I deliberately rejected that.
Determinism as a Product Decision
PredictorsGPT is deterministic by design:
Same input → same output, always.
Why?
Because adaptive systems subtly manipulate user emotion:
- novelty bias
- reinforcement loops
- perceived personalization
In reflective or emotionally vulnerable contexts, that’s dangerous.
Determinism creates:
- predictability
- debuggability
- trust boundaries
From a systems perspective, it’s closer to a pure function than a model.
Minimal Inputs, No Profiles
The only required input is age.
Everything else is optional.
There are:
- no accounts
- no memory
- no behavioral tracking
- no user profiling
This removes entire classes of problems:
- privacy leakage
- model drift
- emotional overfitting
- dark UX patterns
If the system can’t remember you, it can’t manipulate you.
Life as a Curve, Not a Classifier
Internally, the output is structured in three layers:
1. Life Curve (0–80)
A conceptual curve representing:
- momentum
- pressure
- reorientation
- consolidation
It’s not predictive.
It’s descriptive.
Think of it as a time-based interpretive model, not a classifier.
2. Rule Layer
A small, deterministic rule set explaining why a given phase tends to feel unstable, slow, or intense.
Rules are:
- non-judgmental
- non-directive
- context-free
No “do this now” logic.
3. Narrative Layer
This is where language matters.
The system translates abstract rhythm + rules into:
- validation
- perspective
- orientation
No advice.
No commands.
No optimization goals.
Why There’s No “Learning”
From an ML standpoint, this might look underpowered.
That’s intentional.
Learning systems:
- require feedback signals
- optimize toward engagement
- evolve unpredictably
PredictorsGPT is meant to be:
- stable
- repeatable
- ethically bounded
It’s closer to a designed system than a trained one.
What I Explicitly Didn’t Build
PredictorsGPT is not:
- therapy
- diagnosis
- astrology
- fortune telling
- a personality test
It avoids:
- urgency language
- outcome promises
- fear-based framing
If a user leaves feeling calmer but unchanged, that’s success.
Why This Matters (Especially for Builders)
As builders, we’re good at asking:
“Can we make this smarter?”
We’re worse at asking:
“Should this system adapt at all?”
Not every domain benefits from intelligence.
Some domains need constraints.
Reflection tools should reduce noise — not create it.
The Result
PredictorsGPT doesn’t try to guide your life.
It just helps you understand where you are in the rhythm.
No hooks.
No retention tricks.
No data gravity.
Just a quiet, deterministic system.
Top comments (0)