Let's face it - blockchain is hard. One tiny mistake and your project could end up as another "hack" headline. After auditing over 50 DeFi protocols last year, I've seen the same dangerous patterns repeatedly.
Here are the functions and patterns you should NEVER use if you want secure contracts:
1. Low-Level Calls: The Reentrancy Enablers
The infamous call, delegatecall, and staticcall functions have been behind some of the biggest hacks in crypto history. The problem? They allow external contracts to "reenter" your contract before state changes are finalized.
Just last month, a new NFT marketplace lost $3.8M because they used:
(bool success, ) = payable(msg.sender).call{value: amount}("");
...without updating balances first. Classic rookie mistake!
Better approach? Always follow the checks-effects-interactions pattern, use reentrancy guards, or better yet, use the OpenZeppelin libraries that handle this for you.
2. Authentication Disasters: tx.origin
If you're using tx.origin for authentication, you're basically leaving your front door wide open for hackers. This function captures the original sender, not the immediate caller, making your contract vulnerable to phishing attacks.
Always use msg.sender instead - it gives you the actual address that called your function.
3. The Self-Destruction Button: selfdestruct()
The selfdestruct() function was designed to remove contracts from the blockchain, but it's become a major security risk. It can:
- Force ETH into contracts not designed to handle it
- Permanently destroy your contract (no backsies!)
- Break contract dependencies
4. Time Manipulation: block.timestamp
Miners can manipulate timestamps within a certain range. If your contract relies on precise timing (like many gambling dApps do), you're asking for trouble.
Mistakes I See Junior Devs Make
Mistake #1: "I'll just copy-paste from GitHub"
I get it, we all learn by example. But blindly copying code snippets from random GitHub repos is how security nightmares begin. That cool DEX implementation you found? It might have critical vulnerabilities the original author never fixed.
At minimum, run your code through Slither or similar automated vulnerability scanners before deploying.
Mistake #2: "Gas optimization > Security"
Too many devs obsess over saving gas and end up creating security holes. Yes, gas fees are expensive, but losing your entire contract is WAY more costly.
Example: skipping array length checks to save gas might lead to underflow/overflow vulnerabilities. Not worth it!
Mistake #3: "My code is small, so it's secure"
Some of the most devastating hacks came from tiny contracts. Size doesn't equal security. Even a single-function contract can have million-dollar vulnerabilities if it uses dangerous functions.
Conclusion
As someone in the trenches daily, I wonder: will Solidity ever evolve to make these dangerous functions harder to misuse?
Rust has shown that a language can be both powerful and safe by design. Could Solidity adopt similar principles, maybe requiring explicit security annotations for risky operations?
What do you think? Drop your thoughts in the comments!
Disclaimer: This post is for educational purposes only. Always have your contracts professionally audited before deploying with real funds.
Top comments (0)