Unmasking the Difference: Pre-increment (++i) vs. Post-increment (i++) in C++

In C++, the pre-increment (++i) and post-increment (i++) operators might seem to perform the same basic function: adding one to a variable. While this is true at a high level, and many C programmers are familiar with ++i returning the incremented value and i++ returning the original value, the distinction in C++ runs deeper, especially concerning user-defined types.

This post will dissect the core differences by looking at operator overloading, analyze their behavior, and give you solid reasons to often prefer pre-increment in your C++ code.

The Fundamental Distinction: Value vs. Reference

Both ++i and i++ increment the value of the variable they operate on. However, what they return is fundamentally different:

• Pre-increment (++object): Increments the object's value first, and then returns a reference to the (now incremented) object itself.
• Post-increment (object++): Creates a copy of the object's original value, then increments the object's value, and finally returns the copy (the value before incrementation).

This difference becomes glaringly obvious when we examine how these operators are typically overloaded for custom classes.

---

Peeking at Operator Overloading

Let's see how these operators would be implemented for a hypothetical MyClass:

Pre-increment (operator++())

The pre-increment operator directly manipulates the object and returns a reference to it.

class MyClass {
public:
    int value;
    // ... other members and constructors ...

    // Pre-increment
    MyClass& operator++() {
        ++this->value;  // Increment the actual value
        return *this;   // Return a reference to the modified object
    }
};

Post-increment (operator++(int))

The post-increment operator needs to store the original state before incrementing, so it involves creating a temporary object. The int parameter is a dummy argument used by the compiler to distinguish between pre- and post-increment signatures.

class MyClass {
public:
    int value;
    // ... other members and constructors ...

    // Post-increment
    MyClass operator++(int) {
        MyClass temp = *this;  // Create a temporary copy of the current state
        ++this->value;         // Increment the actual value
        return temp;           // Return the temporary copy (original value)
    }
};

From these implementations, you can see that post-increment involves the overhead of creating and returning a temporary object, which can make it less efficient than pre-increment, especially for complex objects.

---

Behavior Analysis: C++++++ vs. ++++++C

Let's consider how these differences play out in (admittedly somewhat contrived) chained operations, assuming C is an instance of MyClass:

• C++++++
  This is parsed as (C++)++.

  1. The first C++ (post-increment) increments C itself but returns a temporary copy of C's original state.
  2. The second ++ then operates on this temporary copy. Result: C itself is only incremented once. Two temporary objects are involved (one for the first C++, and potentially another if the second ++ on the temporary also creates one, depending on how it's handled, though the key is it's not operating on the original C again). This is generally less efficient due to temporary object creation.

• ++++++C
  This is parsed as ++(++(++C)).

  1. The innermost ++C (pre-increment) increments C and returns a reference to C.
  2. The next ++ operates on this reference (i.e., directly on C again), increments C, and returns a reference to C.
  3. The outermost ++ does the same. Result: All increment operations are performed directly on C. C is incremented three times. No temporary objects are created for the return values. This is more efficient.

---

Why You Should Lean Towards Pre-increment (++i)

Based on the above, here's why ++i is generally the preferred choice:

1. Efficiency: Pre-increment avoids the overhead of creating and returning a temporary object. For built-in types (like int, double), modern compilers are often smart enough to optimize away any difference. However, for user-defined types (classes and structs), the cost of constructing, copying, and destructing temporary objects can be significant, especially if these operations are expensive.
2. Clarity of Intent: ++i reads as "increment i, then use its new value." i++ reads as "use i's current value, then increment i." When you don't need the original value, ++i more directly expresses the action of simply incrementing.
3. Consistency: Using ++i by default creates a good habit. When you actually need the value before the increment, you'll consciously use i++, making that specific need more explicit in your code.
4. Avoiding Pitfalls: As seen with (C++)++, post-increment can sometimes lead to operations on temporaries that might not be what you intuitively expect, especially in more complex expressions. While such chained expressions are often discouraged for readability, understanding the mechanics is vital.

---

Conclusion

While both pre-increment and post-increment have their place, understanding their underlying differences is key to writing professional and efficient C++ code.

• Pre-increment (++i): Returns a reference to the object itself after incrementing. Generally more efficient as it avoids temporaries.
• Post-increment (i++): Returns a copy of the object's value before incrementing. Incurs the cost of creating this temporary copy.

Recommendation: In C++, prefer pre-increment (++i) unless you specifically need the value of the variable before it's incremented. This is especially true when working with iterators or custom class types in performance-sensitive loops or operations.

Complex nested operations like object++++++ should generally be avoided as they can significantly reduce code readability and introduce inefficiencies due to temporary object generation.

Happy coding!