Two years ago, everyone was a "prompt engineer." Now everyone's building "AI agents."
Are these the same thing? No. But they're related.
Let me break down the difference.
Prompt Engineering: Talking to AI
Prompt engineering is about crafting the right input to get the right output.
Bad prompt:
"Write a summary"
Better prompt:
"Summarize this article in 3 bullet points, focusing on key takeaways for developers"
Even better:
"You are a technical writer. Summarize this article in 3 bullet points.
Focus on: practical takeaways, code implications, and gotchas.
Keep each point under 20 words."
Prompt engineering is a single turn. You write input, AI gives output. Done.
Skills involved:
- Clear instructions
- Context setting
- Output formatting
- Few-shot examples
- Role assignment
Agent Engineering: Building AI systems
Agent engineering is about designing systems where AI makes decisions and takes actions over multiple steps.
User: "Find bugs in my codebase and fix them"
Agent:
1. Thinks: "I need to first understand the codebase structure"
2. Acts: [calls list_files tool]
3. Thinks: "Let me run the tests to find failures"
4. Acts: [calls run_tests tool]
5. Observes: "3 tests failing in auth module"
6. Thinks: "Let me look at the auth code"
7. Acts: [calls read_file tool]
8. Thinks: "Found the bug - wrong comparison operator"
9. Acts: [calls edit_file tool]
10. Acts: [calls run_tests tool]
11. Observes: "All tests passing"
12. Responds: "Fixed 3 bugs in the auth module..."
Agent engineering is multi-turn. AI reasons, acts, observes, repeats.
Skills involved:
- System architecture
- Tool design
- State management
- Error handling
- Orchestration logic
- Memory systems
The difference
| Prompt Engineering | Agent Engineering | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Single interaction | Multiple steps |
| AI role | Responder | Actor |
| Output | Text | Actions + Text |
| Complexity | Low-medium | Medium-high |
| Skills | Writing, psychology | Programming, architecture |
Prompt Engineering = What you say to AI
Agent Engineering = What AI can do
When you're prompt engineering
You're prompt engineering when:
Writing system prompts
You are a helpful coding assistant.
- Always explain your reasoning
- Use Python unless specified otherwise
- Include error handling in code examples
Crafting user messages
Review this code for security issues.
Focus on: SQL injection, XSS, and authentication bypasses.
Format: bullet list with severity ratings.
Few-shot examples
Convert to JSON:
Input: "John, 25, NYC"
Output: {"name": "John", "age": 25, "city": "NYC"}
Input: "Sarah, 30, LA"
Output: {"name": "Sarah", "age": 30, "city": "LA"}
Input: "Mike, 28, Chicago"
Output:
Output formatting
Return your response as valid JSON:
{
"summary": "...",
"sentiment": "positive|negative|neutral",
"confidence": 0.0-1.0
}
This is all prompt engineering. Single turn. Text in, text out.
When you're agent engineering
You're agent engineering when:
Designing tool systems
tools:
- name: search_codebase
description: Search for code patterns
parameters:
- name: query
type: string
required: true
- name: run_tests
description: Execute test suite
parameters:
- name: path
type: string
default: "."
Building orchestration logic
while not task_complete:
thought = agent.think(context)
if thought.needs_tool:
result = execute_tool(thought.tool_call)
context.add_observation(result)
if thought.has_answer:
task_complete = True
Managing state and memory
class AgentMemory:
def __init__(self):
self.conversation = []
self.tool_results = []
self.learned_facts = {}
def add_observation(self, obs):
self.tool_results.append(obs)
self.extract_facts(obs)
Handling errors and retries
def safe_tool_call(tool, params, max_retries=3):
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
return tool.execute(params)
except ToolError as e:
if attempt == max_retries - 1:
return f"Tool failed: {e}"
context.add(f"Tool failed, retrying: {e}")
This is agent engineering. Multi-turn. Decisions and actions.
They build on each other
Agent engineering doesn't replace prompt engineering. It includes it.
Agent Engineering
├── System design
├── Tool architecture
├── Orchestration logic
├── Memory management
├── Error handling
└── Prompt Engineering ← Still needed!
├── System prompts
├── Tool descriptions
├── Reasoning prompts
└── Output formatting
Good agents need good prompts. The prompts tell AI:
- How to think ("reason step by step")
- When to use tools ("use search when you need information")
- How to format output ("respond in JSON")
- What persona to adopt ("you are a senior developer")
The evolution
Most people follow this path:
Stage 1: Basic prompting
"Summarize this text"
Stage 2: Better prompting
"You are an expert summarizer. Create a 3-point summary focusing on..."
Stage 3: Structured output
"Return JSON with fields: summary, key_points, action_items"
Stage 4: Single tool use
AI can call one tool to get data, then respond
Stage 5: Multi-step agents
AI reasons through problems, uses multiple tools, handles errors
Stage 6: Complex agent systems
Multiple agents, planning, reflection, memory, human-in-the-loop
Stages 1-3 are prompt engineering. Stages 4-6 are agent engineering.
Different skills
Prompt engineering skills
- Writing clearly — Unambiguous instructions
- Understanding AI — What models can/can't do
- Iteration — Testing and refining prompts
- Psychology — How to frame requests
- Domain knowledge — Subject matter expertise
Agent engineering skills
- System design — Architecture decisions
- Programming — Building the orchestration
- API design — Creating good tool interfaces
- Error handling — Graceful failures
- State management — Memory and context
- Security — Safe tool execution
What you need for each
Prompt engineering toolkit
- Playground (Claude, ChatGPT)
- Version control for prompts
- Evaluation framework
- A/B testing
Agent engineering toolkit
- Framework (LangChain, custom)
- MCP server (Gantz Run)
- Tool definitions
- Monitoring/logging
- Testing harness
Common mistakes
Mistake 1: Over-engineering prompts
When you need an agent, no prompt will fix it.
# Won't work no matter how good the prompt
"Check my calendar and if I'm free tomorrow at 3pm,
schedule a meeting with John and send him an email"
# This needs tools, not better prompts
Mistake 2: Under-engineering prompts in agents
Agents still need good prompts.
# Bad agent system prompt
"You are an assistant."
# Good agent system prompt
"You are a developer assistant with access to code tools.
Think step by step before acting.
Always verify changes by running tests.
If something fails, try a different approach."
Mistake 3: Agents for everything
Sometimes a good prompt is enough.
# Doesn't need to be an agent
"Translate this to French"
# A simple API call works
response = claude.messages.create(
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": f"Translate to French: {text}"}]
)
When to use what
Use prompt engineering when:
- Single-turn interaction
- No external data needed
- No actions required
- Simple transformations
- Content generation
Use agent engineering when:
- Multi-step tasks
- External tools needed
- Real-world actions
- Dynamic decision making
- Complex workflows
Use both when:
- Always. Agents need good prompts.
The future
Prompt engineering isn't going away. But agent engineering is where the leverage is.
Good prompts make AI 2x better.
Good agents make AI 10x more capable.
If you only know prompt engineering, you're limited to what AI can do in one turn.
If you know agent engineering, you can build AI that actually does things in the world.
Are you more of a prompt engineer or agent engineer? Where do you spend most of your time?
Top comments (0)