DEV Community

Cover image for The forbidden fruit of vibe coding isn’t bad code.
Sam
Sam

Posted on

The forbidden fruit of vibe coding isn’t bad code.

It’s working code.

Because once something works, your brain **wants **to _trust _it.

The button clicks.
The page loads.
The dashboard renders.
The demo looks real.

And suddenly, it’s tempting to believe the project is further along than it actually is.

But working is not the same as ready.
Working is not the same as secure.
Working is not the same as understood.
And working is definitely not the same as remembered.

That was the surprising part for me.

AI-assisted coding helped me move fast, but it also created a new problem: forgotten assumptions.

The shortcuts.
The warnings.
The “we’ll fix that later” moments.
The decisions that made sense in one session but got fuzzy in the next.

AI-assisted coding helped me move fast, but it also created a new problem: forgotten assumptions.

The internet is noticing this too

“A lot of security is contextual.”

Read the full piece in The Verge

— Jack Cable, security researcher


“Speed without control is a liability, not an advantage.”

Read GitLab’s AI Accountability Report announcement

— Manav Khurana, GitLab


That was the surprising part for me.

AI-assisted coding made it easier to build fast.

But it also made it easier to forget why certain decisions were made in the first place.

And when a quick prototype starts becoming real software, that forgotten context starts to matter.

I wrote more about that here:

Empirical - Your vibe-coded app got serious faster than expected

Curious how others are handling this: where do you keep the “don’t forget this before this ships” stuff when working with AI coding tools?

Top comments (0)