The Problem We Were Actually Solving
At first glance, our platform was simply a successful e-commerce solution. But the truth was more complex. We had designed it to bypass local payment gateways, because they were either unreliable or outright forbidden in many countries, including Ghana. Instead, we routed payments through international gateways, which provided us with the scale and speed we needed. However, this made our platform inaccessible to a significant portion of our user base in Ghana. We were trying to solve the problem of scaling payments without considering the needs of the users in countries we were trying to include.
What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)
Initially, we tried to fix this issue by developing a separate plugin for Ghanaian payment gateways, but it was a failure. The plugin was complex to implement, and support was spotty at best. Users in Ghana often encountered a barrage of errors, from "card declined" to "payment failed." It was clear we needed a different approach. We thought localizing payment options was the answer, but what we didn't realize was that this would only address the symptoms of a deeper problem, not the root cause.
The Architecture Decision
After weeks of research, we finally made a breakthrough. We decided to integrate our platform with local payment providers directly, removing the need for international gateways altogether. This would not only resolve the issue but also improve our overall performance, as transactions would be processed locally and in real-time. We realized that our system's design had been driven by the constraints of international payments rather than the needs of our users. By shifting our focus to local providers, we could tap into a more extensive network of payment options and improve our overall user experience.
What The Numbers Said After
After deploying the new architecture, we saw a significant uptick in sales from Ghana. The average transaction time dropped by over 70%, and the overall success rate for payments increased by 25%. These numbers told us that we had made the right decision. Our users in Ghana could now easily purchase digital products using their preferred payment methods. This change not only improved our user experience but also opened up new revenue streams for creators.
What I Would Do Differently
In retrospect, we should have considered the needs of our international users from the outset. We were so focused on scaling payments that we overlooked the consequences of our design choices on users in countries like Ghana. If I were to do it again, I would prioritize user experience and inclusivity much earlier in the development process. This would have saved us months of tinkering with workarounds and potentially prevented the disappointment of our users in Ghana.
Top comments (0)