The Problem We Were Actually Solving
We initially thought our problem was that our existing payment gateways didn't support international transactions. However, further investigation revealed that the primary issue was the stringent requirements and restrictions imposed by these platforms on businesses and individuals from specific countries, often due to international laws and regulations. The regional limitations were a significant barrier for our users in developing countries.
What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)
We attempted to work with traditional payment platforms, such as Stripe and PayPal, to find country-specific workarounds. We set up separate accounts and implemented various error handling and fallback mechanisms to accommodate the regional payment restrictions. However, the complexity of handling multiple payment platforms, coupled with the high chargeback rates and transaction fees, eventually made this approach unsustainable.
The Architecture Decision
After months of research and experimentation, we decided to implement regional payment gateways tailored to the specific needs of our users in countries facing restrictions. We partnered with local payment processors in Kenya and Ethiopia, focusing on unchained commerce models that allowed for more flexibility and adaptability in payments. This decision was driven by the need for simpler transaction flows, reduced fees, and higher success rates. We replaced our existing payment integrations with these regional gateways, ensuring a seamless user experience for our creators.
What The Numbers Said After
The shift to regional payment gateways proved to be a resounding success. We observed a significant increase in payment success rates and a substantial reduction in chargeback rates. Our users in Kenya and Ethiopia reported a substantial decrease in transaction fees, which in turn led to increased revenue and a higher overall satisfaction with the platform. Data revealed that the regional gateways reduced average processing fees by 35% and increased average transaction velocity by 50% compared to our previous setup with international payment gateways.
What I Would Do Differently
While our choice to implement regional payment gateways was the right one for our use case, I recognize that this approach may not be suitable for all projects. For smaller-scale projects or those with fewer users in restricted regions, working with traditional payment platforms and implementing necessary error handling and fallback mechanisms might be a more feasible option. However, for larger-scale projects with a significant presence in developing countries, investing in regional payment gateways can yield substantial benefits in terms of payment success rates, reduced fees, and increased user satisfaction.
Top comments (0)