DEV Community

Cover image for Building a self-hosted reverse proxy with WireGuard for my homelab behind CGNAT
Rainer Schnittert
Rainer Schnittert

Posted on

Building a self-hosted reverse proxy with WireGuard for my homelab behind CGNAT

I have been building Portlyn for weeks now.

It all started with a problem I had with my homelab setup. It was not a deal but it was annoying every time I worked on my setup.

Some of my services were behind a NAT or CGNAT. I wanted to be able to access them with domains TLS certificates and authentication without having to open up ports on my home network.

Course there are already tools that can do this. I tried a few of them. They did not really work the way I wanted them to.

So after messing around with configs and trying to get tools to work together I thought, "this should be simpler".. That is when I started building Portlyn.


The setup I wanted

I did not want anything complicated. I just wanted:

  • one public entry point

  • my private services to stay behind NAT or CGNAT

  • real domains and certificates

  • authentication for some of my routes

  • a tunnel that I could control

  • logs that would tell me what was going on

  • tools to keep track of

The important thing for me was not that every single piece was new. It was not.

The important thing was that all these pieces would work together in one setup that made sense to me.


The basic idea

Portlyn has two parts:

  • Hub: this runs on a VPS or any machine with an IP

  • Agent: this runs next to my private services behind NAT or CGNAT

The node connects back to the hub through WireGuard. The hub gets HTTP traffic handles TLS, authentication and routing and then sends the request through the tunnel to the right node.

My mental model of this is pretty simple:

Internet
   |
   v
Portlyn Hub on VPS
   |
   | WireGuard tunnel
   v
Node behind NAT / CGNAT
   |
   v
Local services
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This is not meant to be some kind of magic tunnel service.

You still need a VPS or another public IP for the hub. For me that is okay because I already have a VPS.


What it looks like

Here is what the route flow looks like from the hub UI:

Creating a route in Portlyn

The flow I wanted was simple on purpose:

  1. Create a route

  2. Point it to a service behind the tunnel

  3. Enable authentication if the route needs it

  4. Let the hub handle certificates and forwarding

That is the point of Portlyn. I do not want to have to think about five tools every time I want to expose one small service.


What Portlyn can do now

Portlyn has grown faster than I expected. It is definitely not a small script anymore.

Tunnel

  • reverse proxy with authentication for each route

  • WireGuard tunnel between hub and node

  • hub-and-spoke model

  • node can run behind NAT or CGNAT

  • userspace WireGuard path

Certificates

  • ACME with HTTP-01 and DNS-01

  • wildcard certificates

  • DNS-01 support for:

  • Cloudflare

  • Hetzner

  • Route 53

  • DigitalOcean

Login and access control

  • TOTP for admin login

  • passkeys for admin login

  • OIDC SSO

  • role claim mapping

  • GeoIP allow/block lists

  • CrowdSec LAPI integration

  • rate limits

Audit. Release safety

  • hash-chained audit log

  • HMAC-signed webhooks

  • webhook targets for Slack, Discord, ntfy or generic JSON

  • Cosign signed releases

  • self-update with Sigstore chain verification

Some of this might be more than people expect from a homelab tool.

But I kept thinking: if this thing is going to sit in front of my services then authentication, logs and update safety should not be something I put off until later.


The audit log was not planned to become this important

At first I just wanted routing and tunneling to work.

Once I had a tool that could change routes, authentication settings, certificates and node connections I really wanted a clear record of what was happening.

So Portlyn logs things like:

  • admin login

  • route changes

  • authentication policy changes

  • certificate changes

  • connection events

  • self-update events

Example:

Portlyn audit log

Webhook events can be sent to Slack, Discord, ntfy or a generic JSON endpoint.

This is not meant to be a SIEM or anything like that. I just wanted visibility to avoid the "wait what changed?" moment.


What Portlyn is not

I want to be clear about what Portlyn's not because it is still early.

Portlyn works for my use case but it is not trying to be a mature production platform yet.

It is not scaled right now.

For now it is a hub.

It is not a mesh.

The model is hub-and-spoke only.

It is not a Cloudflare Tunnel replacement in the sense.

You still need a VPS or another public IP for the hub.

It is not a WAF.

There are rate limits GeoIP rules and CrowdSec integration. Request bodies are not inspected.

The userspace WireGuard path reaches about 80% of kernel WireGuard throughput in my tests. That is enough for my setup. It is not magic. If you want to push a 1 Gbps link through it this detail matters.


Why not just use Traefik, Caddy or Authentik?

Honestly for setups you probably should.

If you already have a Traefik plus Authentik setup and you are happy with it I am not trying to convince you to throw it

Portlyn is more for people who want one tool that combines:

proxy

+ tunnel
+ certificates
+ route-level authentication
+ basic access control
+ audit logging
+ signed releases/self-updates
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The trade-off is that Portlyn is less flexible than a stack of separate tools.

That is intentional.

I wanted fewer tools to keep track of, not infinite configuration options.


Setup video

I also recorded a full setup video for people who prefer watching instead of reading.

It goes through:

  • installing the hub

  • connecting a node behind NAT or CGNAT

  • creating a route

  • enabling authentication

  • issuing a certificate


Repo

Portlyn is MIT licensed.

GitHub:

https://github.com/invaliduser231/Portlyn

It is still early. Feedback would be really helpful.

I am especially interested, in:

  • whether the hub/node architecture makes sense to people

  • whether the security assumptions are reasonable

  • how people feel about the WireGuard tunnel handling

  • what would make you trust or not trust this in your homelab

I know there is still stuff to polish. This is version 1. I am sure people will find rough edges.

Top comments (0)