Modern architectures don’t fail security reviews because teams lack tools.
They fail because trust is still treated as a network property instead of a system behavior.
Most organizations today run impressive stacks: Zero Trust branding, cloud-native IAM, SIEMs, CSPM, CI/CD security scanners, and a growing list of controls layered on top of one another. Yet security reviews keep ending the same way—conditional approvals, risk exceptions, and uncomfortable silence around “shared responsibility.”
That’s not a tooling gap.
It’s an architectural one.
This article argues that most security failures in modern systems stem from legacy trust assumptions surviving inside modern platforms—assumptions that no amount of tooling can compensate for. We’ll look at where those assumptions hide, why they persist, and how they quietly undermine otherwise well-designed cloud architectures.
This is the first article in a short series on trust, identity, and failure modes in modern systems:
- Part 1: Why Modern Architectures Keep Failing Security Reviews (And It’s Not a Tools Problem)
- Part 2: CI/CD Isn’t Just DevOps—It’s Your Largest Attack Surface
- Part 3: Zero Trust Isn’t About Firewalls — It’s About Identity
- Part 4: The Hidden Cost of Cloud Misconfigurations (It’s Not Just Your Bill)
- Part 5: Observability Isn’t Understanding — Why We Still Don’t Know Our Systems
Top comments (0)