Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning have grown rapidly, driving demand for specialized hardware to handle the computational intensity of these workloads. While graphics processing units (GPUs) have become the default choice for many AI tasks, a range of non-GPU accelerators exist to address specific needs in training and inference. This article examines these alternatives, focusing on current technologies that remain active as of September 2025. It avoids speculation, drawing from established sources on their development, applications, and limitations.
Why Non-GPU AI Accelerators Exist: A Comparison with GPUs
Non-GPU AI accelerators emerged because GPUs, originally designed for graphics rendering, are not always the most efficient or cost-effective option for every AI workload. GPUs excel in parallel processing, making them suitable for the matrix multiplications central to deep learning, but they consume significant power and can be overkill for specialized tasks. Developers and companies sought hardware optimized specifically for AI operations, such as tensor computations in neural networks, to reduce energy use, lower costs, and improve performance in targeted scenarios.
Comparing non-GPU accelerators to GPUs highlights key trade-offs. Non-GPU options, like application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), often outperform GPUs in energy efficiency and latency for inference tasks, where models are deployed to make predictions on new data. For example, they can process AI workloads with lower power draw—sometimes 10-20% less than equivalent GPU setups—making them preferable for large-scale deployments where electricity costs add up. In training, where models learn from vast datasets, non-GPU accelerators like tensor processing units (TPUs) can handle massive parallelism tailored to deep learning, sometimes achieving faster throughput for specific architectures like transformers. They beat GPUs in scenarios requiring high bandwidth for data movement, as their designs prioritize optimized memory access over general-purpose versatility.
Conversely, GPUs surpass non-GPU accelerators in flexibility and ecosystem support. GPUs can run a wide array of workloads beyond AI, including simulations and graphics, and benefit from mature software libraries like CUDA, which simplify development. Non-GPU options are often locked into specific tasks, requiring custom software stacks that can complicate integration. GPUs also scale more easily in mixed environments, where AI tasks coexist with other computing needs.
The upsides of non-GPU accelerators include better power efficiency, potentially lower operational costs in data centers, and customization for AI-specific operations, leading to faster inference in edge devices. Downsides involve limited programmability, higher upfront development costs for custom designs, and smaller developer communities, which can slow adoption and increase debugging time. In practice, non-GPU accelerators complement GPUs rather than fully replacing them, especially in hyperscale environments where efficiency gains justify the investment.
Types and Categories of Non-GPU Accelerators: Applications Across Scales
Non-GPU AI accelerators fall into several categories based on their architecture and intended use. These include ASICs, FPGAs, neural processing units (NPUs), and other specialized chips. Each type serves different scales, from data center mass operations to edge and consumer devices, for both training (model development) and inference (model deployment).
ASICs: These are fixed-function chips designed for specific AI tasks, offering high efficiency but no post-manufacture reconfiguration. Examples include TPUs and similar custom silicon. In data centers, ASICs handle mass training by optimizing for large-scale matrix operations, reducing energy use in hyperscale AI model development. For mass inference, they process queries at scale, like in cloud services running large language models (LLMs).
FPGAs: Reprogrammable hardware that can be customized for various AI workloads. They bridge flexibility and efficiency, making them suitable for edge training where models are fine-tuned on-device with limited data. In edge inference, FPGAs accelerate real-time tasks like object detection in IoT devices, consuming less power than GPUs.
NPUs: Specialized for neural network operations, often integrated into system-on-chips (SoCs). They dominate consumer devices, enabling on-device inference for features like voice recognition without cloud dependency. For edge applications, NPUs support lightweight training, such as adapting models to user behavior in smartphones.
In data centers, these accelerators enable mass training of LLMs by distributing workloads across clusters, often outperforming GPUs in throughput per watt for transformer-based models. Mass inference in data centers uses them for serving millions of queries, as seen in search engines or recommendation systems. At the edge, they handle localized inference in autonomous vehicles or industrial sensors, where low latency is critical. Consumer devices integrate NPUs for everyday AI, like photo enhancement in phones, balancing performance with battery life.
Other emerging categories, like photonic accelerators, use light-based computing for potential efficiency gains, but they remain niche and are not yet widely deployed for general AI tasks.
Review of Major Non-GPU Accelerators: Offerings, Performance, and Use Cases
Several major players offer non-GPU accelerators, including hyperscalers, established companies, startups, and custom designs by AI firms. These are active as of 2025, with no reported shutdowns. Performance comparisons to GPUs are approximate, based on available benchmarks, and vary by workload.
Google's TPU (Tensor Processing Unit): An ASIC developed in-house for deep learning. Versions like TPU v5 are optimized for both training and inference in data centers. In cloud offerings via Google Cloud, TPUs support LLM training and inference, such as running models like Gemini. Compared to NVIDIA A100 GPUs, TPUs can deliver up to 2-3x better energy efficiency for transformer training, but they lag in flexibility for non-tensor workloads. Use cases: Data center training for large models and inference for search/query processing.
AWS Trainium and Inferentia: ASICs from Amazon Web Services. Trainium focuses on training, while Inferentia handles inference. Available on AWS EC2, they support LLM deployments like fine-tuning Stable Diffusion. Benchmarks show Inferentia providing 30-50% cost savings over GPUs for inference-heavy tasks, with lower latency. Use cases: Data center mass inference for e-commerce recommendations; training for custom models.
Microsoft Maia: A custom ASIC for Azure AI workloads. It accelerates training and inference for LLMs like those in Copilot. Early comparisons indicate Maia offers comparable performance to H100 GPUs in optimized scenarios but with better integration into Microsoft's ecosystem. Use cases: Cloud-based training and inference for enterprise AI services.
Meta MTIA (Meta Training and Inference Accelerator): An in-house ASIC for Meta's AI infrastructure. It supports training and inference in data centers, optimized for recommendation systems. Performance edges out GPUs in power efficiency for dense models, with reports of 20-40% reductions in energy use. Not publicly available as a cloud offering. Use cases: Internal data center operations for social media AI.
Intel Gaudi3: An ASIC accelerator for deep learning, acquired via Habana Labs. Available on Intel's cloud and on-premises. It competes with GPUs in training throughput, achieving similar FLOPS to A100s at lower costs for certain workloads. Use cases: Data center training and inference for vision and language models.
Startups like Groq offer language processing units (LPUs) for fast inference, claiming 10x speed over GPUs for LLM queries in edge-like setups. Cerebras uses wafer-scale engines for massive training, outperforming GPU clusters in scale but at higher costs. SambaNova provides dataflow architectures for efficient training. Cloud offerings include Google Cloud TPUs for LLM inference and AWS for custom model training.
Accessing Non-GPU Accelerators for Hobbyists, Developers, Researchers, and Small Businesses
Hobbyists can experiment with non-GPU accelerators through affordable edge devices or cloud trials. For instance, smartphones with NPUs like Qualcomm's Hexagon allow running small inference models via frameworks like TensorFlow Lite, ideal for learning basics without hardware investment. Developers and researchers often use cloud platforms like Google Cloud TPUs, which offer free tiers or low-cost access for prototyping LLMs. Small businesses can deploy inference on AWS Inferentia instances to build applications like chatbots, scaling as needed without owning hardware.
Researchers benefit from FPGAs in kits like Xilinx boards for custom edge training, enabling experiments in areas like robotics. Small businesses integrate NPUs in IoT devices for applications like predictive maintenance, using open-source tools to adapt models. Overall, these groups leverage cloud and integrated hardware to avoid GPU shortages and costs, focusing on efficient learning and app development.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Non-GPU AI accelerators provide viable alternatives for specific efficiency needs, but they do not overshadow GPUs in all areas. Their growth reflects a maturing market where specialization addresses power and cost challenges, particularly in inference. However, adoption depends on software maturity and workload fit.
For those starting out, recommend beginning with cloud TPUs or Inferentia for accessible training and inference. Businesses should evaluate energy savings against integration efforts. Researchers might prefer FPGAs for flexibility. In all cases, test workloads empirically to ensure benefits outweigh limitations.
Listen to a podcast version of the article part 1, part 2, and part 3.
References
What's the Difference Between AI accelerators and GPUs? - IBM. (Dec 20, 2024). https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-accelerator-vs-gpu
The Rise of Accelerator-Based Data Centers - IEEE Computer Society. (2024). https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/it/2024/06/10832449/23jFinH8O2I
AI Accelerators vs. GPUs: What's Best for AI Engineering? (Aug 2, 2024). https://aifordevelopers.io/ai-accelerators-vs-gpus/
AI Accelerator vs GPU: 5 Key Differences and How to Choose. (Feb 15, 2025). https://www.atlantic.net/gpu-server-hosting/ai-accelerator-vs-gpu-5-key-differences-and-how-to-choose/
AWS Trainium vs Google TPU v5e vs Azure ND H100 - CloudExpat. (Mar 27, 2025). https://www.cloudexpat.com/blog/comparison-aws-trainium-google-tpu-v5e-azure-nd-h100-nvidia/
The Role of GPUs in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. https://scienceletters.researchfloor.org/the-role-of-gpus-in-artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning/
AI and Deep Learning Accelerators Beyond GPUs in 2025. (5 days ago). https://www.bestgpusforai.com/blog/ai-accelerators
10 World's Best AI Chip Companies to Watch in 2025 - Designveloper. (Jun 16, 2025). https://www.designveloper.com/blog/ai-chip-companies/
Edge Intelligence: A Review of Deep Neural Network Inference in ... https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/12/2495
Demystifying NPUs: Questions & Answers - The Chip Letter - Substack. (Jun 10, 2024). https://thechipletter.substack.com/p/demystifying-npus-questions-and-answers
Review of ASIC accelerators for deep neural network - ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141933122000163
Edge AI today: real-world use cases for developers - Qualcomm. (Jun 18, 2025). https://www.qualcomm.com/developer/blog/2025/06/edge-ai-today-real-world-use-cases-for-developers
Global AI Hardware Landscape 2025: Comparing Leading GPU ... https://www.geniatech.com/ai-hardware-2025/
TPU vs GPU: What's the Difference in 2025? - CloudOptimo. (Apr 15, 2025). https://www.cloudoptimo.com/blog/tpu-vs-gpu-what-is-the-difference-in-2025/
GPU and TPU Comparative Analysis Report | by ByteBridge - Medium. (Feb 18, 2025). https://bytebridge.medium.com/gpu-and-tpu-comparative-analysis-report-a5268e4f0d2a
AWS Inferentia - AI Chip. https://aws.amazon.com/ai/machine-learning/inferentia/
How startups lower AI/ML costs and innovate with AWS Inferentia. https://aws.amazon.com/startups/learn/how-startups-lower-ai-ml-costs-and-innovate-with-aws-inferentia?lang=en-US
Azure Maia for the era of AI: From silicon to software to systems. (Apr 3, 2024). https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-maia-for-the-era-of-ai-from-silicon-to-software-to-systems/
[PDF] evaluating microsoft's maia 100 as an alternative to nvidia gpus in. (Jul 7, 2025). https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJIT/VOLUME_6_ISSUE_1/IJIT_06_01_008.pdf
MTIA v1: Meta's first-generation AI inference accelerator. (May 18, 2023). https://ai.meta.com/blog/meta-training-inference-accelerator-AI-MTIA/
Meta's Second Generation AI Chip: Model-Chip Co-Design and ... (Jun 20, 2025). https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3695053.3731409
[PDF] Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper. https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/817486/gaudi-3-ai-accelerator-white-paper.pdf
SambaNova, Groq, Cerebras vs. Nvidia GPUs & Broadcom ASICs. (Mar 7, 2025). https://medium.com/%40laowang_journey/comparing-ai-hardware-architectures-sambanova-groq-cerebras-vs-nvidia-gpus-broadcom-asics-2327631c468e
Why SambaNova's SN40L Chip Is the Best for Inference. (Sep 10, 2024). https://sambanova.ai/blog/sn40l-chip-best-inference-solution
SambaNova vs. Groq: The AI Inference Face-Off. (16 hours ago). https://sambanova.ai/blog/sambanova-vs-groq
Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) - Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/tpu
Utilizing Qualcomm NPUs for Mobile AI Development with LiteRT. (Jun 18, 2025). https://ai.google.dev/edge/litert/android/npu/qualcomm
Google Cloud for Researchers. https://cloud.google.com/edu/researchers
generative-ai - AWS Startups. https://aws.amazon.com/startups/generative-ai/
FPGA, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence - San Jose State University. (Dec 12, 2022). https://www.sjsu.edu/ee/resources/laboratories/fpga-robotics-artificial-intelligence/index.php
A Business Owner's Guide to IoT Predictive Maintenance. (Jul 24, 2025). https://www.attuneiot.com/resources/iot-predictive-maintenance-guide
Top comments (0)