Every year around Christmas, we are expected—required, really—to cheerfully sing along to Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, a song that is widely regarded as wholesome, heartwarming, and suitable for children. It’s so culturally entrenched that it didn’t just become a hit song—it spawned a beloved stop-motion movie that gets replayed annually as a kind of unquestioned holiday ritual.
This is a lie.
If you actually listen to the lyrics, or worse, watch the movie, Rudolph is not a story about inclusion or kindness. It is a story about state-sanctioned bullying, conditional acceptance, and the moral philosophy that you are only worthy of dignity if you are useful to power.
Let’s review the facts.
Rudolph is born with a mutation. Not a choice. Not a moral failing. A physical difference he did nothing to earn. His nose glows. That’s it. That’s the crime.
The response?
“All of the other reindeer
Used to laugh and call him names
They never let poor Rudolph
Join in any reindeer games”
This is not subtle. This is open, communal bullying. Not just teasing—systemic exclusion. There is no adult intervention. No North Pole HR department. No reindeer anti-harassment training. Everyone sees this happening and shrugs.
Including Santa.
And this matters, because Santa is not a kindly grandpa in this universe. He is a dictator-for-life, controlling labor, housing, and social standing at the North Pole. He runs a command economy powered by elf labor and reindeer logistics. He absolutely has the authority to shut this down.
He does not.
Instead, the message is clear: conform or suffer.
Rudolph is ostracized, isolated, and taught that his difference is shameful. The song doesn’t even pretend otherwise. It treats this as normal. Character-building, even.
But then—miraculously—a crisis occurs.
Fog.
The supply chain is threatened.
Christmas itself (read: the regime’s legitimacy) is at risk.
And suddenly—suddenly—Rudolph’s mutation is no longer disgusting. It’s strategic.
“Then one foggy Christmas Eve
Santa came to say…”
Note the phrasing. Santa came to say. Not to apologize. Not to reflect. Not to acknowledge years of cruelty. He simply rebrands Rudolph’s condition as an asset now that it is useful.
Rudolph is allowed to participate—not because he deserves dignity as a being, but because his abnormality can be leveraged to achieve state objectives.
This is not redemption. This is instrumentalization.
And yes, Rudolph gets applause at the end. The same reindeer who mocked him now “love him.” But only after he proves his value.
It teaches children that:
- Bullying is fine until the bullied person turns out to be valuable.
- Authority figures don’t owe you protection—only results.
- Difference is tolerated only when it serves power.
Rudolph didn’t change. The world didn’t become kinder. The regime just found a way to exploit what it once despised.
You don’t get acceptance for being different.
You get acceptance for being useful.
If you’re a programmer, this story might feel… familiar.
A lot of us grew up as the weird kids. Too intense. Too quiet. Too literal. Too obsessed with systems, patterns, or ideas no one else cared about. We missed social cues. We asked annoying questions. We didn’t “join in the reindeer games.”
We were tolerated at best. Mocked at worst.
And then, one day, the fog rolled in.
Suddenly the same traits—hyperfocus, pattern recognition, obsession with correctness, discomfort with ambiguity—were no longer liabilities. They were marketable. Billable. Recruitable.
The message didn’t change. The context did.
You weren’t accepted because the world became kinder. You were accepted because your difference could now be leveraged by companies, platforms, and institutions that once would have happily ignored you.
That’s not inclusion. That’s conditional mercy.
This isn’t to say success is bad, or that being valued for your skills is wrong. It’s to say that it’s worth noticing how often dignity arrives after usefulness—and how rarely it arrives on its own.
So no, I don’t sing along anymore.
Because if Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer is a Christmas story, it’s not about goodwill toward all.
It’s about how acceptance works in practice.
And a lot of us deserved better—long before the fog rolled in.
Author’s note: This piece was written collaboratively with an AI. I brought the ideas; it helped me shape them — a process I call vibe thinking.
Top comments (0)