We are living in an exciting era for software development. It has always been an industry of constant evolution, but the rise of artificial intelligence has multiplied the productivity of those who adopted it early.
This new reality, with teams capable of building faster than ever, shines a light on something many leaders still don't want to see: the main bottlenecks are often not in development, but in how we manage processes and make decisions.
The New Bottleneck
When developers become more efficient, tasks are delivered faster, and AI tools can automate or accelerate repetitive work, the real obstacles are exposed: unnecessary processes, unproductive meetings, outdated hierarchies, and a constant need to “feel in control.” All of this slows teams down.
At the root of the problem is often a human flaw: distrust. In many cases, leaders don't truly trust their teams. They try to micromanage, schedule constant ceremonies, request irrelevant status updates, or impose artificial social dynamics. The result? Distracted, frustrated, and demotivated teams.
What Good Leaders Have in Common
The leaders I’ve interacted with, those who enabled their teams to work with true autonomy, shared several traits:
- Solid technical backgrounds: Unsurprisingly, most came from software development or architecture. They understood what it means to build and the complexities involved.
- Few, focused meetings: When the team did meet, it was to resolve blockers or align on concrete goals. No endless chats or empty check-ins.
- Genuine trust in the team: Every team member was assumed to be competent and capable of acting responsibly.
- A service-oriented mindset: They understood that leadership isn’t about control or imposition, but about setting direction and clearing the path. Their role was to unblock, protect the team’s time, and then, step aside.
The Empty Calendar as a Productivity Strategy
The result of this approach? Clean calendars. Uninterrupted schedules. Developers focused, without context-switching every hour or attending irrelevant meetings that feel like background noise.
When a problem came up, it was solved. How? By speaking directly with the right person, Slack, a quick huddle, a message. No waiting for the daily or setting up a “sync.” Interactions were organic and purposeful. Ironically, this model, which might seem isolating, actually encourages genuine collaboration.
With no external impositions, devs collaborated because they wanted to preserve that space of freedom. They knew helping others sustained a no-bureaucracy culture. Over time, this built real bonds, conversations about hobbies, travel, personal life. Relationships formed naturally, not through forced bonding activities.
Common Practices in Truly Agile Teams
This kind of leadership "stepping aside" doesn’t mean absence, but strategic presence. Some common practices in genuinely agile environments include:
- Distributed autonomy: Each team has clarity on objectives and the freedom to decide how to reach them.
- Minimal, purposeful meetings: If it doesn’t help move forward, resolve a blocker, or share something new, it’s not needed. Retrospectives are held only when there’s something to reflect on.
- Spontaneous pair or mob programming: Not imposed, but encouraged when useful.
- Clear definition of “done”: Fewer processes to close tasks, but clear agreements on what’s expected.
- Hiring based on real experience: Not on impersonal tests or abstract algorithm challenges, but on a candidate’s ability to adapt, learn, and work well in a team.
The Myth of Forced Bonding
Companies often try to solve a lack of connection with artificial dynamics: games, mandatory virtual coffees, or forced “social Fridays”. But most people don’t want to be friends with everyone at work. What they do want is respect, smooth collaboration, and an environment where they can be themselves without social pressure.
Real diversity in a team isn’t achieved by forcing affinities, it’s about allowing everyone to connect in their own authentic way.
Conclusion: The Future of Leadership
Leading in tech today isn’t about climbing the hierarchy or designing more processes. It’s about knowing when and how to step aside. It’s about building teams that manage themselves, trusting that people want to do good work, and enabling them to succeed.
The software revolution is not just technical. It’s cultural. And it starts when leaders understand that teams perform better when no one constantly interrupts them to “lead” everything.
Top comments (0)