DEV Community

Cover image for My Experience: Azure Stack HCI architecture patterns
karleeov
karleeov

Posted on

My Experience: Azure Stack HCI architecture patterns

My Experience: Azure Stack HCI architecture patterns

Context

Setting up robust Azure infrastructure can be challenging and error-prone.

The Journey

Why I Started

I was facing this challenge while working on a project for a client. The existing solution was:

  • Slow (took 5 minutes to complete)
  • Expensive (costing $500/month)
  • Difficult to maintain (required constant manual intervention)

I knew there had to be a better way using Azure services.

What I Tried First

Approach 1: Azure Functions

[FunctionName("MyFunction")]
public static async Task<IActionResult> Run(
    [HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post")] HttpRequest req,
    ILogger log)
{
    // Implementation
    return new OkObjectResult("Success");
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Result: Partial success, but cold starts were an issue.

What Worked

After experimenting, I found the winning combination:

  1. Azure Service A: For handling X
  2. Azure Service B: For processing Y
  3. Azure Service C: For storage

Here's the final architecture:

# Deploy infrastructure
az deployment group create \
  --resource-group myRG \
  --template-file main.bicep
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Key Metrics

Metric Before After Improvement
Execution Time 5 min 30 sec 90% faster
Cost $500/mo $50/mo 90% cheaper
Maintenance Daily Monthly 97% reduction

Challenges Faced

Challenge 1: Authentication Issues

Problem: Managed identities weren't working as expected.

Solution: Added explicit role assignments:

az role assignment create \
  --assignee $PRINCIPAL_ID \
  --role "Contributor" \
  --scope $RESOURCE_ID
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Challenge 2: Cost Overruns

Problem: Costs were higher than expected in the first month.

Solution: Implemented auto-scaling rules and budget alerts:

az monitor autoscale create \
  --resource $RESOURCE_ID \
  --min-count 1 \
  --max-count 3 \
  --count 1
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Lessons Learned

  1. Start small: Don't over-engineer the first version
  2. Monitor early: Set up monitoring from day 1
  3. Cost matters: Always estimate costs before deploying
  4. Test thoroughly: Use Azure DevTest Labs
  5. Document everything: Future you will thank you

What I'd Do Differently

  1. Use Bicep instead of ARM templates from the start
  2. Implement CI/CD pipeline earlier
  3. Spend more time on cost estimation upfront
  4. Use Azure Advisor recommendations sooner

Recommendation

Use this approach when:

  • ✅ You need high availability
  • ✅ Cost optimization is important
  • ✅ You have variable workloads

Avoid this approach when:

  • ❌ Workload is constant and predictable
  • ❌ You need sub-millisecond latency
  • ❌ Budget is extremely tight

Resources


Have you faced similar challenges? I'd love to hear about your experience in the comments! 💭


This post is part of my Azure learning journey. Follow for more real-world experiences!

Top comments (0)