DEV Community

Kim Arnett 
Kim Arnett 

Posted on

What Makes an Environment Inclusive?

Yup, I'm opening that can of worms. I don't care what your gender, race, orientation, etc, etc is. I want to know what an 'inclusive environment' means to you.

For me:
I like to see women in leadership roles. I like to see that everyone's opinion is valued and that everyone feels welcome to speak up. Even the quiet people. :)

Secondly: What would you do to create a more inclusive environment to your standards?

I'd make sure existing ladies are being promoted as much as their male colleagues. If someone is dictating the conversation during team events or meetings, I'd find a way to get a balance in the room, even if it resorts to something like a speaking stick.

Latest comments (39)

Collapse
 
wolfhoundjesse profile image
Jesse M. Holmes

An inclusive environment, to me, is one that doesn't have an "inclusiveness program" or policy, but rather just treats people like people.

This has been on my mind a lot lately. I think it should speak for itself, as in, if you walked into my workplace, you'd notice the cultural diversity of our teams, women in leadership roles, etc. Or in a perfect world, you wouldn't notice those things; you'd notice people happy in their jobs, comfortable with their colleagues, and driven toward a common mission.

We're a growing organization, but we are geographically located just on the outside ring of the tech companies in D.C. and Baltimore, and we also have to compete with all of the cleared space positions available at the NSA and twenty other government agencies/military contractors in the area. Different industry, but developers and otherwise end up there for various reasons.

I think our work culture and our inclusive environment should help us bring on more great candidates. How will people know about it if we aren't talking about it? How can we talk about it without bragging about it, or making it seem like an underhanded effort to generate good PR? Those are the questions that have been on my mind. I'm a developer, not a recruiter, but my organization is important to me, and I want to work with great people.

Maybe one approach would be to do exactly what I said at the beginning—share our successes and other stories, attach faces to them, and let it speak for itself.

Thanks, @kaydacode , for bringing up this topic!

Collapse
 
kaelscion profile image
kaelscion

An inclusive environment, to me, is one that doesn't have an "inclusiveness program" or policy, but rather just treats people like people. Yes, I am a white male of European descent. But I am also Autistic, Bipolar, and have days where I cannot leave my house due to anxiety levels being through the roof. Luckily, I'm a contractor and freelancer so days on the couch crying are okay. But I've worked at several environments where mental health issues were totally understood, but with a deadline in mind.

By that I mean that my colleagues and supervisors, or even the people working under me were really understanding of the fact that the fluorescent lights were making me head feel like it was going to explode. They acted totally okay with the fact that I could tell a high-producing sales person that he and his team wanted in a product was totally irrelevant and he could go back to counting his money and let software people worry about software problems, then be unable to leave my office the next day due to fear that I would somehow be killed in doing so. The problem was, after awhile, the "inclusiveness" and "understanding" went away and my issues became a liability. Suddenly, 5-star reviews turned into the being raked over the coals, even though my productivity couldn't be higher.

Real inclusiveness is being accepting of people in every shape, size, orientation, gender, religion, and mental health status without a deadline in mind. This isn't some effort to generate good PR. The idea of "Look! We promoted a black man!" or "We have engineers who are women that are actually productive!!!" is absolute nonsense because you are bragging about it. Inclusiveness isn't about public relations or a company's image and if it is, it is fake as fake can be. If you accept everybody, you don't need blow a trumpet ahead of yourself for it, you just do it because its the right thing to do.

Collapse
 
kaydacode profile image
Kim Arnett 

Very well said! Thank you so much for sharing. I couldn't agree more :)

Collapse
 
comunica2sc profile image
Comunica2 s. coop.

In- or exclusion has all to do with the goal oriented competitive production environment. There is selection of personel to begin with. I think that we should start with the realisation that exclusion is part of the system. The way to make it more inclusive is to escape the system, not try to patch it. I think the most inclusive system is where people receive mutual support and where organically new initiatives are born and die without frustration jealousy or friction. It is a system where the person and community is more important that production goals.

Collapse
 
squidbe profile image
squidbe

Diversity (of various kinds) has been well covered in this topic, so I'll just +1 it. I'd just like to add that I want to see more inclusivity of differing work styles. In software, open floor plans seem to be a given, but I find them difficult to work in. The assumption is that open floor leads to more collaboration, but all I've experienced over the past decade is that they make it more difficult for me to focus whether that be for writing code or even just for discussing possible solutions with teammates. Headphones only help so much, and they do nothing WRT the constant stream of people walking in my field of view.

I'd love to see companies provide quiet/"closed" environments as well as open floors (some companies do). A big part of inclusivity is letting everyone perform up to their potential, and based on past experience, I know I'm not performing up to mine.

Collapse
 
jbeetz profile image
J Beetz

My feeling is teamwork, inclusion and success work hand in hand. I simply cannot do things as well as some of my coworkers. I also sometimes prefer to share a problem than tackle it alone. This in turn has created a place where coworkers have also come to me with their challenges.

I have also worked with people who chose to not share their challenges. Instead they were 'competing ' with me and others. I've found these people made it hard for themselves.

I think the secret to this is focusing on the challenge together and supporting people where they are at, not expecting them to change. Instead focusing on how to improve by being a good team member.

This approach has worked for me in some very difficult situations. The sharing piece is incredibly important, but the listening piece is critical.

Collapse
 
kaydacode profile image
Kim Arnett 

Having a safe environment where you can share and get real with your team members is where it’s at. Competing with one another is just too exhausting.

Collapse
 
simonrice profile image
Simon Rice

First of all, quality question & discussion 🙂 I genuinely believe everyone should strive to make their working environment inclusive and it pays dividends too on a business and community level!

Although an inclusive environment can consist of a broad range of aspects, I think it can summed up in one sentence as:

A positive, non-confrontational and (ideally) friendly environment where everyone has mutual respect for each other and their contributions.

Some practical ideas to help make this happen include:

  • Experienced people: take the time to be open to helping out less experienced people, and by "less experienced" I can also mean senior/lead level people who aren't fully clued up in your project. Also notice I haven't explicitly said developers up to this point as this sort of thing applies for experience non technical people too. However, on a technical front, make more of an effort of helping out than just leaving less experienced developers with just "you should be able to do that" without any pointers.
  • All developers: make an effort to ensure you're polite in reviewing your fellow developers' work and never flame or insult them. Better still, review with an open mind and make the effort to let this reflect in the language you use for your comments - instead of "do that", ask "is there any reason why you did this instead of that?" - and don't be afraid to leave positive comments too, especially if you've learned something new from their work! There's often context in why things are the codebase aren't as ideal as they should be, and sometimes the cost-benefit ratio of improving them isn't worth it, as painful as it can be!
  • Everyone: make an effort to be positive, firm and non-confrontational to your workmates. Also, be welcome listen to any suggestions and don't dismiss them because "things don't work that way here". Finally, practice empathy and take time to understand the whys and wherefores!

Your idea of getting balance in a room is a very interesting one - I admit sometimes I can be completely quiet - sometimes it's because I have very little to contribute, but sometimes something pops into my mind that I'm a bit nervous to say, and by the time I get to say it, the conversation has really moved on. I have a feeling this is where the role of a good leader comes in to play, but any tips for this scenario when the room isn't being led so well are more than welcome 😉.

There's a lot I've missed out and I'm sure I've missed the mark somewhere here! But once again, thank you for the awesome discussion 🤘

Collapse
 
lynnetye profile image
Lynne Tye

Inclusive to me means:

  • varying the types of company or team events and making sure to have social hours and events that aren't centered on drinking alcohol
  • choosing venues that accommodate nursing mothers and people with disabilities (and considering people's religion whenever food is involved)
  • providing ways for employees to provide feedback anonymously
  • investing in an HR team early on
  • creating an interview rubric that doesn't focus on previous education or open source contributions

I've found Project Include to be incredibly informative and educational when it comes to thinking about what a truly inclusive environment and culture means. I've also learned so much about what inclusion is by working with various engineering teams that focus on it.

Collapse
 
kaydacode profile image
Kim Arnett 

Great insight! Thanks so much for the resources also.

Collapse
 
notyoyoma profile image
notyoyoma • Edited

I would love to see more women in tech. I work in a male dominated office, and the culture and conversations are cringeworthy sometimes.

That being said, it's important to keep hiring and promotion decisions strictly objective. (Not biased towards or against either gender)

Immagine if, in your desire to advance females, you promoted an incompetent female instead of a competent male. Everyone who had to work under or with her would resent your "inclusive agenda". It would start to look a lot like nepotism.

I think some of the ideas Google has worked on in this area is a step in the right direction. Here's a podcast talking about it: youarenotsosmart.com/2015/06/08/ya...

I particularly like applying the strength of the double-blind control method to hiring practices.

So to answer your question, IMO an inclusive environment is one with the brightest people, an open idea space, and a focus on scientific objectivity.

To foster that kind of environment, i have no idea. I'm glad that's not my job.

Collapse
 
kaydacode profile image
Kim Arnett 

I'm glad that's not my job.

Same. lol

I agree - conversations can be so messy. Especially with 'locker room talk'. It has no place in the workplace.

Collapse
 
notyoyoma profile image
notyoyoma

Or "locker room smells" ugh

Collapse
 
orloffm profile image
Mikhail Orlov

Inclusive for me is when:

1) Everyone's contributions are welcome and possible. Probably in a way that everyone has a part of the project he or she can be creative in and fully responsible for.
2) Physical work conditions are suitable for everyone, not only for loud extroverts.

Collapse
 
kaydacode profile image
Kim Arnett 

Yes!

Collapse
 
aidanharding profile image
Aidan Harding

I think your comment about getting balance in the room is an under-appreciated one. Inclusivity is about more than just sex/race/religion/etc. It's also about people's nature i.e. introverts vs. extroverts.

As a way of making sure that the more introvert inclined people can still contribute their valuable insights, I make sure that we circulate topics for a meeting ahead of time. This gives time for the people who think best in a quiet room to do so. Then, I can chair the meeting in such a way as to invite people to speak, so that it's not just the loudest voices who get heard.

Without this, it's easy to end up only hearing from those who are good at thinking on their feet and voicing their opinions. In reality, there are important contributions waiting to be found, and self-confidence to be built.

The loud voices scenario seems to typify the "bro" culture that development can end up being, and that is toxic to all kinds of inclusivity.

Collapse
 
kaydacode profile image
Kim Arnett 

My favorite idea around building a team was creating an ecosystem -- you need all kinds of types who rely on each other to make it work. Idea stolen from Kerri Miller -@kerrizor