You shouldn't review coding agents output without AI itself

Raw human-in-the-loop review is overrated.

AI has already proven useful enough that I started wondering: why are we still reviewing AI-generated code manually when AI itself can help review it?

When using Claude Code or Codex, I’d first rely on specialized subagents for deeper reviews. But for a quick overview of what actually changed, opening a basic Git diff viewer wasn’t enough for me.

So I built Magic Diff, a tool that uses AI to summarize changes across one or more committed or uncommitted files.

It’s open source, written in Go/Wails/React.

Repository: https://github.com/gsscoder/magik-diff