Introduction
When I tell people I use Go for backend development, the most common reactions are:
- “Why not Java?”
- “Isn’t Go too simple?”
- “Rust is cooler, right?”
As a student, I didn’t choose Go because it’s trendy or because someone on Twitter said it’s the future.
I chose Go because it forced me to think clearly while building backend systems.
This post is not a Go tutorial.
It’s an honest explanation of why I use Go, what it does well, where it frustrates me, and why I still stick with it for backend engineering.
My Background Before Go
Before Go, my backend understanding was fragmented:
- I knew how to write APIs
- I knew how to connect databases
- I knew frameworks more than systems
But I didn’t really understand what my backend was doing under load, under failure, or under concurrency.
At the same time, I was learning Operating Systems, Computer Networks, and DBMS in college.
I wanted a language that didn’t hide these fundamentals behind heavy abstractions.
That’s when Go clicked.
What Go Taught Me About Backend Engineering
Simplicity Is a Feature, Not a Limitation
Go is often criticized for being “too simple”.
No fancy syntax.
No deep inheritance trees.
No clever language tricks.
At first, this felt restrictive.
Later, I realized it was intentional.
Go forces you to:
- write readable code
- think before adding abstractions
- make decisions explicit
When building backend systems, clarity matters more than cleverness.
Explicit Error Handling Changed How I Think
Go doesn’t have exceptions.
Instead of hiding failures, Go makes you face them:
result, err := doSomething()
if err != nil {
return err
}
Initially, this felt repetitive.
But over time, it taught me something important:
Backend systems fail all the time — pretending they don’t is dangerous.
Explicit error handling made me:
- think about failure paths
- design safer APIs
- avoid “happy path only” thinking
This aligned very well with what I learned in Operating Systems and DBMS.
Go and Concurrency: Simple, But Not Magical
Why Goroutines Felt Natural
After studying OS concepts like:
- threads
- context switching
- synchronization
- race conditions
Go’s concurrency model felt… honest.
Goroutines are lightweight, but they’re not magic.
Channels help structure communication, but they don’t replace thinking.
Go doesn’t stop you from writing buggy concurrent code —
but it makes concurrency visible, not hidden.
That visibility matters a lot in backend systems.
What Go Doesn’t Protect You From
This is important.
Go will not save you from:
- race conditions
- deadlocks
- poor synchronization design
You still need:
- discipline
- understanding
- testing
I actually like this.
It matches real backend engineering.
Why Go Works Well for Backend Systems
From a practical perspective, Go fits backend work really well.
Strong Standard Library
Out of the box, Go gives you:
- HTTP servers
- networking primitives
- encoding and decoding
- concurrency tools
I didn’t need 10 libraries just to start building.
Performance Without Complexity
Go gives you:
- good performance
- predictable memory usage
- fast startup times
Without:
- manual memory management
- overly complex language rules
For backend services, this balance is powerful.
Easy Deployment
This might sound boring, but it matters.
- Single static binary
- Minimal runtime dependencies
- Easy containerization
As a student deploying projects, this reduced friction a lot.
The Downsides (Go Is Not Perfect)
I don’t trust blogs that only talk about pros.
So here are the real downsides I’ve experienced.
Verbosity Can Be Annoying
Go code can feel repetitive:
- error checks everywhere
- boilerplate in some patterns
This can slow you down for small scripts.
Generics Arrived Late (and Are Limited)
Generics exist now, but:
- they’re intentionally conservative
- some patterns are still awkward
If you’re coming from languages with powerful generics, this can feel limiting.
Not Ideal for Everything
I wouldn’t use Go for:
- UI-heavy applications
- complex domain-heavy business logic
- places where expressive type systems matter more than simplicity
Go shines in systems and services, not everywhere.
Why I Still Choose Go as a Student
As a student backend engineer, Go gave me something more valuable than productivity:
It gave me a clear mental model.
Go made me:
- understand what my code is doing
- respect concurrency
- think about failures
- build systems, not just features
That foundation matters more than learning five frameworks.
Go vs Other Languages (My Honest Take)
I don’t think Go is “better” than everything else.
- Java has a massive ecosystem
- Rust has stronger safety guarantees
- Python is incredibly productive
But Go sits in a sweet spot:
- simple
- fast
- honest about systems
For backend engineering, that trade-off works for me.
What I’m Still Learning
Using Go didn’t make me an expert.
I’m still learning:
- better concurrency patterns
- distributed systems
- observability
- database internals
- system design trade-offs
Go didn’t solve these problems —
it made them visible, which is more important.
Closing Thoughts
Choosing a backend language is not about hype.
It’s about:
- how it shapes your thinking
- how it handles failure
- how it scales with complexity
For me, Go helped bridge the gap between CS fundamentals and real backend systems.
And as a student, that mattered more than anything else.
Thanks for reading — still learning, still building.
Top comments (0)