Invisible stigma is a concept many UX researchers may not fully recognize, yet it deeply influences how people with disabilities engage in user research. I recently presented the German version of my talk on invisible stigma at Technica11y, originally from Inclusive Design 24. Revisiting my notes inspired me to share the extended thoughts and jokes that did not make it into the live event. This article explains what invisible stigma is, why it matters, and how it shapes UX research outcomes.
What Is Invisible Stigma?
To understand invisible stigma, we first need to look at stigma itself. The term stigma comes from the Latin stigmat- meaning “mark” or “brand” and originally referred to a physical scar made by a hot iron. Today, stigma refers to a set of negative and often unfair beliefs that society holds about certain groups or conditions.
According to Merriam-Webster, stigma means:
- A set of negative and unfair beliefs that a society or group of people have about something
- A mark of shame or discredit
- An association of disgrace or public disapproval
- A visible indicator of disease or condition
Most of these meanings relate to negative judgment or physical visibility, but stigma can also be invisible.
Visible Indicators vs Invisible Stigma
Some disabilities come with visible indicators, which can be helpful in certain situations. For example, people with low vision often use a white cane or wear a yellow arm badge with three dots. These signals are important for safety, especially in traffic, as they communicate to drivers not to assume the person sees them. In orientation mobility training, even small gestures from drivers, like a hand signal to cross the road, can make a big difference.
However, visible indicators can also bring unwanted attention. In social settings like coffee shops or parks, people may approach and offer help unsolicited. While well-intentioned, this can be uncomfortable or intrusive. Many people with disabilities choose to fold up their canes or hide visible markers to avoid such encounters because “not everybody needs to know that I’m blind.”
Invisible stigma is the experience of managing how others perceive you when no physical marker is present. For example, concerns about pickpocketing arise when someone needs to hold both a phone and a white cane in public. This constant awareness and navigation of social perception create a heavy mental load.
Understanding Invisible Stigma
Invisible stigma is more challenging to spot because, like the wrestler John Cena, it is often unseen. You experience it rather than observe it. Discrimination based on invisible stigma is arbitrary and does not require visible markers. For example, in hiring, people are often advised to remove photos, birthdates, and even gender from resumes to avoid bias.
The advantage of invisible stigma is that people can choose if and when to disclose it. However, choosing not to disclose it means accommodating oneself discreetly, which adds to mental fatigue. This is similar to masking among neurodivergent individuals, where natural behaviors are concealed to fit societal expectations.
Invisible Disabilities and Intersectionality
Invisible disabilities include any disabilities not obvious to others, such as certain chronic illnesses, mental health conditions, or neurodivergence. The Hidden Disability Sunflower initiative helps make invisible disabilities more visible, but visibility often depends on context.
For instance, a person using a white cane walking on the street is visibly low vision. However, the same person inside a café with the cane folded in their bag is not immediately recognized as disabled.
Invisible stigma goes beyond disabilities. It includes characteristics socially devalued but not readily apparent, like sexual orientation, gender identity, religious affiliation, or illness. Intersectionality reminds us that a person’s identity consists of multiple overlapping factors, each influencing their experience with stigma.
How Invisible Stigma Affects UX Research
Invisible stigma creates unique challenges for UX researchers. Participants may downplay or compensate for difficulties during interviews. Many disabilities require significant preparation to manage daily life. For example, a blind person planning public transport routes often memorizes stops and connections rather than relying on GPS, which may not be reliable or accessible.
Similarly, some autistic individuals rehearse conversations in advance as a compensation strategy. These behaviors may seem normal to the person but could mask the extra effort required, affecting how researchers interpret their experiences.
Masking is a common defensive behavior where people hide their natural personality or struggles to fit in or avoid negative judgment. This coping mechanism can be subconscious or intentional.
As a researcher, noticing masking in participants raises an ethical question. How far should you probe for honest feedback when participants may feel uncomfortable revealing their full experience? Respecting participants’ boundaries and comfort is essential. It is okay to acknowledge masking without pushing too hard for disclosure. User research is about understanding within limits, not forcing vulnerability.
Research Beyond Disability Focus
Invisible stigma also influences research when disability is not the explicit focus. For example, I noticed one participant downplayed accommodations in a second interview conducted in a different language and setting. The change in context and presence of another person affected their openness.
Approximately 15% of the world’s population lives with some form of disability. Many adapt their environments in subtle ways, like increasing text size instead of wearing prescription glasses. Some participants may not even realize they have a disability, especially with late diagnoses of neurodivergence or conditions like diabetic retinopathy.
Medical conditions such as diabetic retinopathy cause small but impactful vision loss, which the brain often compensates for without conscious awareness. Recognizing these nuances is important for inclusive UX research.
How to Address Invisible Stigma in UX Research
There is no simple solution to invisible stigma in research, but these strategies can help:
- Listen to Understand: Avoid seeking confirmation of your assumptions. Instead, focus on truly understanding participant experiences.
- Do Your Homework: Research medical and social contexts related to disabilities relevant to your study, using reliable sources.
- Prioritize Individual Experience: Treat each participant as an expert on their own lived experience, rather than relying solely on clinical definitions.
- Encourage Comfortable Disclosure: Foster a positive and respectful environment that shows genuine interest and enthusiasm without pressure.
- Respect Statistics: Expect a significant portion of participants to have disabilities; inclusivity improves with larger, more diverse samples.
Final Thoughts: Invisible Stigma Is a Systemic Challenge
Invisible stigma remains a systemic issue rooted in societal perceptions and biases. Until disability and other stigmatized characteristics are normalized as neutral traits, these challenges will persist.
UX researchers can contribute by being aware of invisible stigma, respecting participant boundaries, and designing inclusive research processes. This awareness improves not only research quality but also the overall inclusivity of design solutions.
If you are a UX researcher, reflecting on invisible stigma is essential to truly understand and design for all users. By recognizing the hidden barriers that participants face, you can create more empathetic and accessible products.
If you enjoyed this article, you might also like A11y News, my monthly newsletter covering accessibility, practical insights, curated resources, and real-world takeaways.
Articles will be reposted here on Medium as well, but multipart series will be combined into one post once completed.
Top comments (0)