While building a visual forensic UX research tool using Google AI Studio, I found a trick to fix UI/UX issues when vibe-coding: instead of treating the AI as one assistant who "fixes" your interface, I started running it as multiple simulated users each with their own goals, frustrations, and blind spots.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐:
"๐๐ค๐ต ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข ๐๐ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ. ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐ถ๐ญ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ฅ๐ช๐ง๐ง๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐น๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ง๐ข๐ค๐ฆ: ๐ข ๐ณ๐ถ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ค๐ฌ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ช๐ต ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฃ๐ช๐ญ๐ฆ, ๐ข ๐ด๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ต๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ช๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ถ๐บ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฆ๐ท๐ข๐ญ๐ถ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ค๐ถ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐บ, ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ด๐ฌ๐ช๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฃ๐ฐ๐ข๐ณ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ. ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ต ๐ด๐ต๐ถ๐ค๐ฌ? ๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ช๐ด๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด๐ต๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ? ๐๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ช๐ป๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ค๐ช๐ด๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ต ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ถ๐น_๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ค๐ฉ.๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐ง๐ช๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ด๐ถ๐จ๐จ๐ฆ๐ด๐ต ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐จ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ๐ด."
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐: The AI generates structured, persona-based feedback instead of generic suggestions. You get specific friction points, not fluff.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐น๐: Faster iteration, less bloat, and UI decisions backed by simulated multi-perspective research without the research timeline.
No frameworks. No buzzwords. Just a prompt that forces the AI to argue with itself before it gives you advice. And finally, you can implement without getting headache when you ask AI for changings and it removes functionalities in app.
Building with Cursor, Antigravity, or AI Studio? Try it on your next screen.
Top comments (0)