DEV Community

Joshua Matthews
Joshua Matthews

Posted on

Deploying Next.js Apps: Vercel vs Alternatives in 2025

Vercel is the obvious choice for Next.js deployment. They built the framework, after all. But obvious isn't always best.

Here's when to use Vercel, and when to look elsewhere.

Vercel: The Gold Standard

Pros: Zero-config deployment, automatic preview deployments, excellent DX, built-in analytics.

Cons: Gets expensive at scale, some vendor lock-in.

Best for: Teams wanting the smoothest experience, startups moving fast.

Cloudflare Pages

Pros: Generous free tier (unlimited bandwidth), excellent global edge network, zero cold starts, significantly cheaper at scale.

Best for: Cost-conscious projects, globally distributed audiences.

AWS Amplify

Pros: Full AWS ecosystem integration, good for AWS-heavy stacks.

Best for: Teams already invested in AWS.

Self-Hosted with Docker

FROM node:20-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
RUN npm ci && npm run build

FROM node:20-alpine AS runner
WORKDIR /app
ENV NODE_ENV production
COPY --from=builder /app/.next/standalone ./
COPY --from=builder /app/.next/static ./.next/static
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["node", "server.js"]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Best for: Large-scale applications, teams with DevOps capability.

Quick Comparison

Platform Free Tier Edge Best For
Vercel 100GB/mo Yes DX
Cloudflare Unlimited Yes Cost
AWS Amplify 12mo free Limited AWS
Self-hosted N/A Your choice Control

My Recommendation

Starting out? Use Vercel - the DX is unmatched.

Costs becoming a problem? Evaluate Cloudflare Pages.

Want maximum control? Docker + any VPS.

Don't over-optimise early. Ship first, optimise hosting when you have real traffic data.


We deploy production Next.js applications across various platforms at LogicLeap. The right hosting choice depends on your needs - we help you figure that out.

Top comments (0)