Choosing the right architecture for your Node.js application is like picking the best tool for the job.
Monolithic and microservices architectures each have their pros and cons, and understanding their differences is crucial for making the right decision.
This blog dives into when to use each, how they communicate, their development complexity, and what additional libraries you might need.
What is Monolithic Architecture?
A monolithic architecture is a single, unified codebase where all application components—like authentication, business logic, and database operations—reside in one place.
Use Cases for Monolithic Architecture
- Startups & MVPs: Faster development and fewer moving parts.
- Small to Medium Apps: Applications with straightforward requirements.
- Tightly Coupled Workflows: Where components heavily depend on each other.
- Limited Team Size: Easier for a small team to manage.
How Things Communicate?
Since everything lives in the same process, communication is simple:
- Function calls handle most interactions.
- Synchronous execution keeps things predictable.
Dev Time, Complexity, Learning Curve
- Dev Time: Faster initial development due to fewer moving parts.
- Complexity: Lower complexity, but harder to scale.
- Learning Curve: Easier for beginners as there's no need to manage multiple services.
Additional Libraries
- Express.js for routing.
- Sequelize or TypeORM for database ORM.
More on monolithic architecture: Wikipedia
What is Microservices Architecture?
A microservices architecture splits an application into independent, loosely coupled services, each handling a specific business capability.
Use Cases for Microservices Architecture
- Large & Scalable Applications: Apps expected to scale in traffic and complexity.
- Multiple Teams Working on Different Features: Ideal for organizations with separate teams for different services.
- Independent Deployments & Updates: When you want to update one part of the app without redeploying everything.
- Tech Stack Flexibility: Different services can be built with different technologies.
Organizing Microservices: The Right Way
The fundamental goal of microservices is to structure code into small, independent systems that each handle a well-defined business function. Instead of blindly breaking applications into tiny services, a better approach is to align microservices with business capabilities such as Billing, Shipping, or User Management.
- Domain-Driven Design (DDD) plays a key role in designing effective microservices.
- Microservices should evolve within a well-segregated codebase so that modifications in one service do not disrupt others.
- Larger organizations benefit significantly as different teams can own specific microservices, reducing inter-team dependencies.
How Things Communicate?
Since services are separate, they must communicate over a network:
- Synchronous: REST or GraphQL API calls.
- Asynchronous: Message queues like Kafka, RabbitMQ.
- Event-Driven: Pub/Sub systems like Redis Pub/Sub.
Dev Time, Complexity, Learning Curve
- Dev Time: Slower to start but scales better in the long run.
- Complexity: Higher due to inter-service communication, orchestration, and deployment.
- Learning Curve: Steeper, as it involves learning service discovery, API gateways, and messaging systems.
Common Mistakes & Lessons from Industry
- The initial microservices vision was based on smartly grouping services around business capabilities, but many companies misunderstood this and overcomplicated their architectures.
- Some enterprises created hundreds or even thousands of microservices, leading to excessive communication overhead and performance issues.
- Companies like Uber realized the pitfalls and transitioned to Domain Services, rediscovering key concepts like bounded contexts and autonomous components.
- The key takeaway: Start with a monolith, then transition to microservices when necessary, based on real needs like scalability, stability, or deployment flexibility.
Additional Libraries
- Express.js or Fastify for API development.
- Docker & Kubernetes for containerization and orchestration.
- Kafka, RabbitMQ, Redis for inter-service communication.
- OpenTelemetry for monitoring and tracing.
- gRPC for high-performance RPC-based communication.
More on microservices: Wikipedia
Final Thoughts: Which One to Choose?
| Feature | Monolithic | Microservices |
|---|---|---|
| Development Speed | Faster | Slower (initially) |
| Scalability | Harder | Easier |
| Complexity | Lower | Higher |
| Tech Flexibility | Limited | High |
| Maintenance | Tough as the app grows | Easier with well-defined services |
| Learning Curve | Easier | Steeper |
Key Takeaways
- Begin with a monolithic approach, and only shift to microservices when scaling becomes a real issue.
- Group services around business capabilities rather than making numerous tiny services.
- Prioritize asynchronous messaging over RPC to reduce tight coupling.
- Pay attention to service boundaries and API contract evolution to avoid future integration nightmares.
If you're building a small project or MVP, go with monolithic. If you're handling large-scale applications that require flexibility, microservices might be the better approach.
Further Reading
- Refactor a monolith into microservices
- Rebuilding Netflix Video Processing Pipeline with Microservices
- Better Load Balancing: Real-Time Dynamic Subsetting
- Introducing Domain-Oriented Microservice Architecture
What’s your experience with monolithic vs. microservices in Node.js? Drop your thoughts below!
I’ve been working on a super-convenient tool called LiveAPI.
LiveAPI helps you get all your backend APIs documented in a few minutes
With LiveAPI, you can quickly generate interactive API documentation that allows users to execute APIs directly from the browser.
If you’re tired of manually creating docs for your APIs, this tool might just make your life easier.
Top comments (0)