Documentation always starts strong.
We write a clean README.
We add architecture notes.
We promise ourselves we’ll “keep docs updated.”
Then reality hits.
Features ship quickly.
Refactors happen.
Dead code disappears.
And documentation slowly becomes fiction.
The Real Problem
Documentation doesn’t fail because developers are lazy.
It fails because:
- It’s manual.
- It’s disconnected from code.
- It doesn’t evolve automatically.
In fast-moving teams, code is the source of truth.
Docs should evolve with it.
But they don’t.
What I’m Building
I’m experimenting with a tool called DocFlow.
The idea is simple:
- Connect your GitHub repo
- Analyze the structure of your codebase
- Generate structured documentation automatically
- Keep documentation updated as the code changes
Instead of writing docs manually, they’re derived from the actual codebase.
Still Early
Right now, this is in the validation stage.
I’ve put up a simple waitlist while building the core engine:
👉 https://docflow.mmopro.in/
I’m trying to answer a few questions:
- Would you trust AI-generated documentation?
- What would make this genuinely useful?
- Should this be a SaaS platform or GitHub Action first?
- What language support is essential at launch?
Why I’m Sharing Early
Because I’d rather validate the problem deeply before building too much.
If documentation drift has ever annoyed you, I’d love your honest thoughts.
Even if it’s:
“This won’t work.”
Top comments (0)